4
$\begingroup$

Let $\Gamma$ be a finitely generated subgroup of $C^*$. For a polynomial $P\in Z[x_1,...x_k]$, determine whether $P(x_1,...x_k)=0$ has a zero in $\Gamma$. Is this decidable?

Motivation is related to the question whether whether there are standard examples of stable theories that are undecidable: the theory of $(C,+,*, \Gamma)$ (that is, we add a predicate for the subgroup $\Gamma$) is superstable, and a positive answer is necessary (and perhaps sufficient) for this theory to be decidable. With a similar motivation (the superstable theory of generic powers where you add to an algebraically closed field multivalued functions $x^\alpha$ where $\alpha$ is sufficiently generic), one can ask similar but complicated number theoretic questions related to Faltings' and Ax's theorems. $\Gamma$.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ How are you given $\Gamma$? $\endgroup$ Nov 25, 2011 at 17:17
  • $\begingroup$ @QiaochuYuan: in any way you prefer, say by giving the finitely many generators as complex numbers. $\endgroup$
    – mmm
    Nov 26, 2011 at 2:22
  • $\begingroup$ @mmm: okay, but how are you given the complex numbers? $\endgroup$ Nov 26, 2011 at 3:19
  • $\begingroup$ The question is equivalent to the following one. Given an ideal $I$ in the ring of polynomials $\mathbb{C}[x_1,...,x_n]$ and a polynomial $f(x_1,...,x_m)$ consider the set $F$ of all polynomials obtained from $f$ by substitutions $x_i\mapsto u_i$, $i=1,...,m$, where $u_i$ are monomials in $\mathbb{C}[x_1,...,x_n]$. Question: Is intersection $F\cap I$ empty? The set $F$ does not have a nice structure, so the answer is not clear. To be more precise and to be able to talk about algorithms, one probably need to replace $\mathbb{C}$ by the algebraic closure of $\mathbb{Q}$. But it is not necessary $\endgroup$
    – user6976
    Nov 26, 2011 at 3:53
  • $\begingroup$ Continued: one can always assume that all coefficients are in some finitely generated subfield of $\mathbb{C}$ which is a finite extension of a purely transcendental extension of $\mathbb{Q}$ (of finite transcendence degree). This gives a way to algorithmically represent the generators of $I$ and coefficients of $F$. $\endgroup$
    – user6976
    Nov 26, 2011 at 4:04

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.