MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Suppose $\mathfrak{A}$ is a Boolean algebra and $\mathfrak{J}$ is chain of ideals in $\mathfrak{A}$ ordered by inclusion such that none of its elements is countably generated. Clearly, the union $\bigcup \mathfrak{J}$ is an ideal. Can it be countably generated?

share|cite|improve this question

Take te interval algebra, $B$, of the ordinal $\omega_1\times\omega$; for $n\in\omega$ let $I_n$ be the ideal consisting of the elements of $B$ that are bounded below $\omega_1\times n$. None of the ideals $I_n$ is countably generated but the union $\bigcup_n I_n$ is countably generated, by the family $\lbrace \omega_1\times n:n\in\omega\rbrace$. I assume here that you mean that $A$ generates $I$ in case $A\subseteq I$ and for all $x\in I$ there is $a\in A$ such that $x\le a$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you. For me, an ideal $I$ is generated by $A$ if $I$ is the intersection of all ideals containing $A$. Your definition is clearly equivalent to mine for $A=\{p\}$ but I am not sure if this actually the same for infinite generating sets. – GiroCont Nov 23 '11 at 12:44
GiroCont, you need only take the collection of finite joins of elements of your generating set to get a generating set in the sense of KP Hart. But the set of finite joins from a countable set is still countable, and so the two notions for the ideal are equivalent. – Joel David Hamkins Nov 23 '11 at 14:20

Let $\mathfrak{A}$ be the power set of an uncountable set $X$, which is a complete Boolean algebra. Select disjoint sets $X_n\subset X$ of size $\omega_1$, and let $J_n$ be the ideal generated by $X_0\sqcup\cdots\sqcup X_n$, together with the countable subsets of $X_{n+1}$. Thus, each ideal $J_n$ is countably complete (closed under countable unions) and not countably generated, and they form a chain $J_0\subset J_1\subset\cdots$. The union $\bigcup_n J_n$, however, is simply the ideal generated by the sets $X_n$.

The general situation of this example (and also of KP Hart's example, which is fundamentally similar) is to have a tower of ideals $J_n$, such that nested between them are principal ideals $I_n$, so that the chain looks like: $$J_0\subset I_0\subset J_1\subset I_1\subset\cdots$$ The point is that the union of the ideals $J_n$ is the same as the union of the principal ideals $I_n$, which is of course countably generated because they are principal.

share|cite|improve this answer
It would suffice if the interleaving ideals $I_n$ were countably generated, rather than principal. Thus, any chain of non-countably generated ideals $J_n$ for which we can find countably generated interleaving ideals $I_n$ will serve as an example. – Joel David Hamkins Nov 23 '11 at 14:22

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.