Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Edit: incorrect claim at end of earlier version; thanks to Matthew Daws for pointing this out in comments.

$\newcommand{\cM}{{\mathcal M}}\newcommand{\stp}{{\overline{\otimes}}}$The following technical question arose in some work I'm doing, which concerns traces on Banach algebras, but which has wandered into territory that I don't know well.

Let $(\cM,\Delta)$ be a Hopf von Neumann algebra: that is, $\cM$ is a von Neumann algebra and $\Delta: \cM\to \cM\stp\cM$ is a coassociative, injective, normal $*$-homomorphism.

Does there always exist a completely bounded, linear map $T:\cM\stp\cM\to \cM$ such that $T\Delta$ is the identity? If so, can we always choose $T$ to be normal?

This works for many several examples, for instance when $\cM$ is injective as a von Neumann algebra [the image of $\Delta$ is then complemented in $B(H\otimes H)$ by a norm-one projection], or $\cM$ is a locally compact quantum group in the sense of Kustermans-Vaes [use the fundamental unitary and then slice]. or if the predual $\cM_*$ has a bounded approximate identity for the natural product induced by $\Delta_*$.

share|improve this question
2  
Erm... How do you use the fundamental unitary to slice? You have that $\Delta(x) = W^*(1\otimes x)W$ and so $W\Delta(x)W^* = 1\otimes x$. So it would be tempting to use the map $M\overline\otimes M \rightarrow B(H), z\mapsto (\omega\otimes\iota)(WzW^*)$ but I don't see why this lands in $M$?? Or did you have another argument in mind (in which case, I'd love to see it!) –  Matthew Daws Nov 14 '11 at 9:38
    
Argh, you're right - I think I had examples where $\mathcal M$ is injective or $(\mathcal M)_*$ is operator biflat in mind. Will edit accordingly –  Yemon Choi Nov 14 '11 at 21:59
add comment

1 Answer

This is far from a full answer (but maybe it will inspire other answers).

I think all the cases Yemon gives, we only get a cb map, but we don't get normality. However, in some special cases, you do get a normal map.

Firstly, if $M=L^\infty(G)$ with $\Delta(f)(s,t) = f(st)$, then define $T_*:L^1(G) \rightarrow L^1(G\times G)$ by \[ T_*(f)(s,t) = f(st) f_0(s), \] where $f_0\in L^1(G)$ is some fixed, positive function with $\|f_0\|_1=1$. This is bounded, as \begin{align} \|T_*(f)\|_1 &= \int_G \int_G |f(st) f_0(s)| \ dt \ ds = \int_G \int_G |f(ss^{-1}t)| \ dt \ |f_0(s)| \ ds \\ &= \int_G \|f\|_1 |f_0(s)| \ ds = \|f\|_1, \end{align} using the left-invariance of the Haar measure. Then the pre-adjoint $\Delta_*:L^1(G\times G)\rightarrow L^1(G)$ is \[ \Delta_*(f)(t) = \int_G f(s,s^{-1}t) \ ds, \] i.e. convolution (if you set $f=a\otimes b$). So then \[ \Delta_* T_*(f) (t) = \int_G T_*(f)(s,s^{-1}t) \ ds = \int_G f(ss^{-1}t) f_0(s) \ ds = f(t). \] So $\Delta_* T_*$ is the identity, as required.

More generally, and as Yemon alludes to in a comment, if $(M,\Delta)$ is a compact Kac algebra, then it's operator biprojective (see Aristov's paper "Amenability and compact type for Hopf-von Neumann algebras from the homological point of view"). So we can choose $T$ to be cb and normal (and with various $M_*$ module properties). If we can choose $T$ with these module properties (but not necessarily normal) then $M$ is said to be operator biflat. For $VN(G)$ this was investigated by Aristov, Runde and Spronk, "Operator biflatness of the Fourier algebra and approximate indicators for subgroups". It seems to be unknown if $VN(G)$ ever fails to be operator biflat. Of course, this is a much stronger condition that Yemon asks for.

It seems surprising to me that we can just write down a suitable (normal) map $T$ for $L^\infty(G)$, but that it seems that Yemon's question is open for $VN(G)$.

Edit (29 Nov): (This is technical; I hope I got all the details correct). Suppose $G$ is a locally compact group such that $VN(G)$ admits a faithful normal trace (I think is true if $G$ is a separable SIN group, for example). Then let $\varphi$ be the Plancheral weight on $VN(G)$; let $\omega$ be a normal tracial state. Then $\psi=\varphi\otimes\omega$ is a semifinite trace on $VN(G\times G)=VN(G)\overline\otimes VN(G)$, and for $x\in VN(G)_+$, we have that $$ \psi(\Delta(x)) = \varphi((\iota\otimes\omega)\Delta(x)) = \omega(1) \varphi(x) = \varphi(x) $$ as $\varphi$ is invariant for $\Delta$ (I know this from the quantum group setting; see papers of Kustermans and Vaes). Let $(\sigma_t)$ be the modular automorphism group for $\varphi$; then $(\sigma_t\otimes\iota)\Delta(x) = \Delta(\sigma_t(x))$ for $x\in VN(G)$, and so as $\omega$ is a trace, we see that $\Delta(VN(G))$ is invariant for the modular automorphism group of $\psi$. By a theorem of Takesaki there is a normal conditional expectation $\epsilon:VN(G\times G)\rightarrow \Delta(VN(G))$ with $\psi(x) = \psi(\epsilon(x))$ for all $x$ in the definition ideal of $\psi$.

So in particular, this gives a positive answer (even with the "normal") condition in the separable SIN case, say.

share|improve this answer
    
Of course, the formula for $T$ which I wrote down in the $L^\infty(G)$ case is just $(\omega\otimes\iota)W(\cdot)W^*$; it might just be blind luck that this works in the commutative case... –  Matthew Daws Nov 16 '11 at 14:14
    
If $G$ is discrete, $\Delta: VN(G) \to VN(G) \otimes VN(G)$ is a trace preserving normal homomorphism, its image is therefore always complemented by a normal conditional expectation, right? So the question is open in the non-discrete case only? (But perhaps this is contained in the setting of compact Kac algebra, please forgive my ignorance on the subject). –  Mikael de la Salle Nov 16 '11 at 14:32
    
@Mikael: Yes to all points! ($VN(G)$ is "compact" in the Kac algebra sense if and only if $G$ is discrete). –  Matthew Daws Nov 16 '11 at 17:58
    
I think that the answer to my question would also be yes if $G$ is almost connected, using the result proved by Connes (in one paragraph using a complicated paper by Dixmier that people don't cite enough, but that's another story) that for such $G$, $VN(G)$ is injective. Does that look right? Of course the operator biflatness question is much harder for such groups... –  Yemon Choi Nov 16 '11 at 21:00
1  
Yes, sure-- but that doesn't give a normal map $T$, which was mainly what was bothering me (that, and somehow using that $VN(G)$ is injective seems like a big stick...) –  Matthew Daws Nov 16 '11 at 21:15
show 3 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.