I need example that associated sheaf functor doesn't preserve arbitrary products. I think that one can provide an example for sheaves over topological space. Thanks for your help.
Remember to vote up questions/answers you find interesting or helpful (requires 15 reputation points)
|
3
3
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
6
|
An example where sheafification does not preserve arbitrary products is where we take sheaves over a (sober) space $X$ that is not locally connected, for example the space of irrationals or Cantor space. Recall that a Grothendieck topos $E$ is locally connected if the (essentially unique) geometric morphism $\Gamma = f_\ast: E \to Set$ has a left adjoint $f^\ast$ that in turn has a left adjoint. More generally, a geometric morphism $f_\ast: E \to F$ between toposes is an essential geometric morphism if its left adjoint $f^\ast$ has a left adjoint. We have the following facts:
|
|||
|
|
You can accept an answer to one of your own questions by clicking the check mark next to it. This awards 15 reputation points to the person who answered and 2 reputation points to you.
|
6
|
Let $X$ be a space. An abelian group (or a set, if you prefer) $G$ determines a constant presheaf, call it $C_G$, and the associated sheaf is the sheaf of locally constant maps into $G$. Given a family $G_i$ with product $G$, the product of the presheaves $C_{G_i}$ is the presheaf $C_G$, but the product of the associated sheaves is not in general the sheaf of locally constant maps to $G$. (If $X$ is not locally connected then one can easily have a map to $G$ which projects to a locally constant map to $G_i$ for each $i$ but which is not locally constant itself. ) This is presumably a down-to-earth special case of what Todd Trimble is saying. |
||||||
|

