Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Suppose I have a self-adjoint operator $\mathbf{L}$ which I seperate in two parts which are themselves self-adjoint. I write this in terms of their eigenvalues/eigenvectors:

$\mathbf{v} \Lambda \mathbf{v}^T = \mathbf{v}_1 \Lambda_1 \mathbf{v}^T_1 + \mathbf{v}_2 \Lambda_2 \mathbf{v}^T_2$

The two parts can also be written as

$\mathbf{v}_1 \Lambda_1 \mathbf{v}^T_1= DK_1D^T$

$\mathbf{v}_2 \Lambda_2 \mathbf{v}^T_2= DK_2D^T$

with $K_1$ and $K_2$ both symmetric, $D$ is skew-symmetric. Suppose $K_{1,2}$ are formed by the vector products $\mathbf{b}\mathbf{b}^T$ and $\mathbf{b_\bot}\mathbf{b}^T_\bot$ respectively.

How do I connect the eigenvectors $\mathbf{v_1}$ to $\mathbf{v_2}$? My guess is that $\mathbf{v_1}(i)^T\mathbf{v_2}(i)=0, \quad \forall\\, i$, but I don't know how to proof it.


K1,2 are formed by the vector products bbT and b⊥bT⊥ respectively and b and b⊥ are perpendicular to each other. 1) No, they can be written as such, no need for proof there.

So $D\textbf{b}\textbf{b}^TD^T$ has eigenvectors unrelated to the eigenvectors of $D \textbf{b}\bot \textbf{b}^T_\bot D^T$ ?

share|improve this question
1  
I am sorry but I got a bit confused by your notation. This may be standard but I have not encountered it. Could you explain a bit more what is what? More precisely: what is your space? What objects are there ($\Lambda$...)? What is $v_1(i)$? Thanks. –  András Bátkai Oct 26 '11 at 13:31
    
Hi András, thanks for reading :) . $\Lambda$ is a diagonal matrix filled with the eigenvalues, $\mathbf{v}$ is a matrix which columns are formed by the eigenvectors. $\mathbf{v}(i)$ is the $i^{th}$ eigenvector. My main question is basically what $\mathbf{b}\mathbf{b}^T$ versus $\mathbf{b_\bot}\mathbf{b}^T_\bot$ means for the difference between $\mathbf{v}_1$ and $\mathbf{v}_2$. –  Bramiozo Oct 26 '11 at 13:53
add comment

2 Answers 2

So your question seems to be : what is the connection between the eigenvectors of $A_1=Dbb^TD^T$ and $A_2=Db_\perp b_\perp^TD^T$ ?

Well it's easy to find these eigenvectors. First case : $Db,Db_\perp$ linearly independant.

Then the eigenspaces of $A_1$ are ${\mathbb R}Db$, and $(Db)^\perp$, and similarly for $A_2$. Since $D$ is skew-symmetric, in particular it does not preserve orthogonality and there is no connection between the eigenvectors of $A_1$ and $A_2$. The second case is obvious.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks Fabien. I was wondering, suppose we reverse it and state that the set of eigenvectors $\mathbf{R}$ is the summation of two distinct parts, say $\mathbf{R}=\mathbf{R}_1+\mathbf{R}_2$ where each column represents an eigenvector. Now I want that $\mathbf{R}_1(i)\cdot\mathbf{R}_2(i)=0,\, \forall i$ where $i$ indicates a specific eigenvector $\mathbf{R}(i)$ and of course $\mathbf{R}(i)=\mathbf{R}_1(i)+\mathbf{R}_2(i)$. (Also suppose that the eigenvectors are normalised.) –  Bramiozo Aug 7 '12 at 15:28
    
What kind off requirement would be in place for $\mathbf{R}_1$ and $\mathbf{R}_2$ for this to be true? –  Bramiozo Aug 8 '12 at 9:21
add comment

Hi Bramiozo.

What you write is a bit confusing. Here are some questions in order to understand better :

1) When you say "the two parts can also be written", this is an hypothesis, is it ? (anyway without further hypothesis there is no connection between $v_1$ and $v_2$)

2) "Suppose $K_1$ and $K_2" etc. : this is another question then ?

3) Is $b$ a vector ? Is $b_\perp$ orthogonal to $b$ ?

I guess your matrices are real. If yes, you should right symmetric instead of self-adjoint.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.