Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In connection with this MO post (and without any applications / motivation whatsoever), here is an apparently difficult - but nice - problem.

For a non-zero real number $s$, consider the infinite sequence $$ P_s := \{ 1^s, 2^s, 3^s, \ldots \} . $$ What is the number of terms, say $l(s)$, of the longest arithmetic progression contained in this sequence?

For instance, since there exist three-term arithmetic progressions in squares, but no such four-term progressions, we have $l(2)=3$.

It is easy to see that if $s$ is the reciprocal of a positive integer, then $P_s$ contains an infinite arithmetic progression; hence we can write something like $P(1/q)=\infty$. It can be shown that this is actually the only case where $P_s$ contains an infinite progression. (This is certainly non-trivial, but not that difficult either - in fact, in a different form this was once posed as a problem on a Moscow State University math competition).

If now $s$ is the reciprocal of a negative integer, then $P_s$ contains an arithmetic progression of any preassigned length; this is a simple exercise. Are there any other values of $s$ for which $l(s)$ is infinite?

Conjecture. For any real $s\ne 0$ which is not the reciprocal of an integer, the quantity $l(s)$ is finite; that is, there exists an integer $L>1$ (depending on $s$) such that $P_s$ does not contain $L$-term arithmetic progressions.

Three-term progressions are not rare; say, for any integer $1<a<b<c$ with $b>\sqrt{ac}$ there exists $s>0$ such that $\{a^s,b^s,c^s\}$ is an arithmetic progression. However, I don't have any single example of a four-term progression in a power sequence (save for the case where the exponent is a reciprocal of an integer).

Is it true that $l(s)\le 3$ for any $s\ne 0$ which is not the reciprocal of an integer?

Indeed, excepting the cases mentioned above and their immediate modifications, I do not know of any $s$ such that $P_s$ contains two distinct three-term progressions.

Is it true that if $s\ne p/q$ with integer $q\ge 1$ and $p\in\{\pm1,\pm2\}$, then $P_s$ contains at most one three-term arithmetic progression?

$$ $$

As a PS: I was once told that using relatively recent (post-Faltings) results in algebraic number theory, one can determine $l(s)$ for $s$ rational. Can anybody with the appropriate background confirm this?

share|improve this question
    
Regarding $P_s$ containing at most one $3$-term AP, I guess you want to assume $a,b,c$ are coprime (otherwise you could take any AP and multiply it with $k^s$). –  François Brunault Oct 24 '11 at 14:17
    
@Francois: absolutely. –  Seva Oct 24 '11 at 14:31
    
This question is similar to this one: mathoverflow.net/questions/59471/… –  Kevin O'Bryant Oct 24 '11 at 17:14

2 Answers 2

In the case $s=p/q$ with $|p| \geq 3$, there is no $3$-term AP in $P_s$. The proof is by reducing to the case $s=p$, as follows.

Let $A=a^p$, $B=b^p$, $C=c^p$ such that $A^{1/q}+C^{1/q}=2B^{1/q} \quad (*) \quad$ and $(A,B,C)=1$. Let $K=\mathbf{Q}(\zeta_q)$ be the $q$-th cyclotomic field and $L=K(A^{1/q},B^{1/q},C^{1/q})$. Then $L/K$ is a finite abelian extension of exponent dividing $q$ and by Kummer theory, such extensions are in natural bijection with the finite subgroups of $K^{\times}/(K^{\times})^q$. The extension $L/K$ corresponds to the subgroup generated by the classes $\overline{A},\overline{B}, \overline{C}$ of $A,B,C$ in $K^{\times}/(K^{\times})^q$. In view of the following lemma, it suffices to prove $L=K$.

Lemma 1. If $n^p$ is a $q$-th power in $K$, then $n$ is a $q$-th power in $\mathbf{Z}$.

Proof. Assume $n^p=\alpha^q$ with $\alpha \in K$, then taking the norm we get $n^{p(q-1)}=N_{K/\mathbf{Q}}(\alpha)^q$. Since $\alpha$ is an algebraic integer, we get that $n^{p(q-1)}$ is a $q$-th power in $\mathbf{Z}$, and since $p(q-1)$ and $q$ are coprime, we get the result.

Lemma 2. The integer $B$ is relatively prime to $A$ and to $C$.

Proof. By symmetry, it suffices to prove $(A,B)=1$. Let $\ell$ be a prime number dividing $A$ and $B$. Then $\ell^{1/q}$ divides $A^{1/q}$ and $B^{1/q}$ in the ring $\overline{\mathbf{Z}}$ of all algebraic integers. By $(*)$ it follows that $\ell^{1/q} | C^{1/q}$. Thus $C/\ell \in \mathbf{Q} \cap \overline{\mathbf{Z}} = \mathbf{Z}$ which contradicts $(A,B,C)=1$. This proves Lemma 2.

By equation $(*)$, we have $K(B^{1/q}) \subset K(A^{1/q},C^{1/q})$ which reads $\overline{B} \in \langle \overline{A},\overline{C} \rangle$ in $K^{\times}/(K^{\times})^q$. We can thus write $B \equiv A^{\alpha} C^{\gamma} \pmod{(K^{\times})^q}$ for some $\alpha,\gamma \geq 0$. By a reasoning similar to Lemma 1, we deduce that $B/(A^{\alpha} C^{\gamma})$ is a $q$-th power in $\mathbf{Q}$ but since this fraction is in lowest terms (Lemma 2), we get that $B$ is a $q$-th power in $\mathbf{Z}$.

Now let $\sigma$ be an aribtrary element in $\mathrm{Gal}(L/K)$. We have $\sigma(A^{1/q}) = \zeta \cdot A^{1/q}$ and $\sigma(C^{1/q})=\zeta' \cdot C^{1/q}$ for some $q$-th roots of unity $\zeta$ and $\zeta'$. Considering the real parts of both sides of $\sigma(*)$, we see that necessarily $\zeta=\zeta'=1$. This shows that $L=K$ as requested.

share|improve this answer
3  
Thanks! We thus have $$ l(p/q) = \begin{cases} \infty &\text{if}\ |p|=1, \\ 3 &\text{if}\ |p|=2, \\ 2 &\text{if}\ |p|\ge 3. \end{cases} $$ –  Seva Oct 25 '11 at 8:35

When s is an integer, you are asking about three-term arithmetic progressions among nth powers. There are none when n > 2! This was a 1952 conjecture of Denes and is now a theorem of Darmon and Merel, part of the wave of Diophantine results that followed in the wake of Wiles's work on modularity. (Indeed, the existence of a 3-term AP among nth powers is tantamount to a solution to a^n - 2 b^n = c^n, which is manifestly in the same ballpark as Fermat's equation.)

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for the reply - but, frankly, I was aware of that paper of Darmon and Merel. Perhaps, I should have mentioned it in my original post, but somehow I feel it is already somewhat longish... What I do not know is whether Darmon-Merel extends onto the rational case. (I was once told it does, but would be happy if someone could confirm this.) Maybe, on this occasion: another fact I have not mentioned is that $l(-s)=l(s)$; and so one can confine to the case $s>0$. –  Seva Oct 24 '11 at 15:15
    
@Seva : I think that one can reduce the rational case to the integral case using some Galois theory of Kummer extensions. The idea is that if $a^{p/q}+c^{p/q}=2 b^{p/q}$ then we get other identities by applying elements of the Galois group. From this it should be possible to prove that $a,b,c$ are $q$-th powers. Well, this is very rough, so one should check the details. –  François Brunault Oct 24 '11 at 15:42

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.