MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I asked this question on Math StackExchange recently but the only useful comment I got was that this could be a good question for Math Overflow. Here it goes:

Consider the Gaussian $G(x):=e^{-x^2}$ on the real line, and localize it to the region $|x|\sim 2^k$ by multiplying it by an appropriate smooth cut-off. More precisely, take $\phi\in C_0^\infty(\mathbb{R})$ supported in the region $$\{x\in\mathbb{R}: \frac{1}{2}<|x|\leq2\}$$ such that $0\leq\phi\leq 1,$ and let $\phi_k(x):=\phi(2^{-k}x)$. Consider: $$G_k(x):=\phi_k(x)G(x).$$ It is straightforward to check that $\|G_k\|_{L^1}\lesssim 2^ke^{-4^k}$, which tends (very quickly) to $0$ as $k\rightarrow\infty$. Also, using Young's convolution inequality one can easily show that $\|\widehat{G_k}\|_{L^1}\leq \|\phi\|_1\|G\|_1$, but this gives no decay in terms of $k$.

My question is: does $\|\widehat{G_k}\|_{L^1}$ decay as $k\rightarrow\infty$? If so, how fast? Can you prove sharp bounds (in $k$)?

Thank you.

share|cite|improve this question
Original MSE question: – Yemon Choi Oct 13 '11 at 21:37
Note that much of the phrasing above comes from DJC's answer to that MSE question – Yemon Choi Oct 13 '11 at 21:40
@Yemon: Yes, I should have mentioned that. Thanks! – user17240 Oct 13 '11 at 22:27

If I didn't miss anything, the dominated convergence argument turns out to work well. The following shows that $\widehat{G_k}$ can be dominated by a rapidly decaying function.

Denote $\psi=\widehat{\phi}, \psi_k=\widehat{\phi_k}$, then $\psi_k(y)=2^k\psi(2^ky), \int \psi_k=0$ and $\int |\psi_k|=\int |\psi|$, hence

$$ |\widehat{G_k}(-x)| =|\widehat{\phi_k}\ast G(-x)| =|\int \psi_k(y)G(y+x)dy| =|\int \psi_k(y)[G(y+x)-G(x)]dy|$$ $$=|\int_{|y|\le |x|/2} \psi_k(y)[G(y+x)-G(x)]dy|+|\int_{|y|\ge |x|/2} \psi_k(y)[G(y+x)-G(x)]dy|$$ $$\le \frac{|x|}{2}\sup_{B(x,|x|/2)}|G'|\cdot \int |\psi|+C\int_{|y|\ge |x|/2}|\psi|dy$$

The last line is a function in $x$ decaying at any rate.

In view of the above argument, the function $\phi$ and $G$ can be replaced by any Schwartz functions where in addition $\phi$ vanishes at $0$, and we will still have $\|\widehat{G_k}\|_1 \rightarrow 0$. An estimate of the rate of decay follows in the specified case.

share|cite|improve this answer

Since $\phi$ is $C^\infty_c$ we know that $\widehat{\phi} \in \mathcal{S}(\mathbb{R})$, in particular $\widehat{\phi}(\xi) \lesssim (1+|\xi|)^{-100}$. On the other hand $\widehat{\phi_k}(\xi) = 2^k \widehat{\phi}(\xi 2^k)$ which by our previous estimate satisfies $|\widehat{\phi_k}(\xi)| \lesssim 2^k (1+|2^k \xi|)^{-100}$. Now, $\widehat{G_k} = G \ast \widehat{\phi_k}$ so by Cauchy-Schwarz we can estimate the $L^\infty$ norm of $\widehat{G_k}$ by $\lesssim 2^{-90k} \|G\|_{L^2}$. So by the dominated convergence theorem $\|\widehat{G_k}\|_{L^1} \to 0$ as $k \to \infty$.

share|cite|improve this answer
I agree that the $L^\infty$ norm of $\widehat{G_k}$ is small (it is bounded by $\|G_k\|_{L^1}$). But how will this imply bounds on the $L^1$ norm of $\widehat{G_k}$? I don't think dominated convergence will do it... – user17240 Oct 26 '11 at 1:04
it doesn't imply bounds, just decay to 0 – anonymous student Oct 26 '11 at 22:34
it is a qualitative statement – anonymous student Oct 26 '11 at 23:05
Well, "decay to 0" is equivalent to some kind of bound. My second sentence can be rephrased as "how will this imply that the $L^1$ norm of $\widehat{G_k}$ tends to $0$ as $k\rightarrow\infty$?". $L^1$ and $L^\infty$ norms are in general not comparable... – user17240 Oct 27 '11 at 0:06
i dont think you can justify the use of dom conv in the last line – Otis Chodosh Nov 8 '11 at 20:18

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.