Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In pondering this MO question and in particularly its 1st answer, and answers to
this one recently posed, I realized there ought to be a dodecahedral K3 surface $X$. This $X$ would fiber as an elliptic surface over $CP^1$ with 12 singular fibers, each of type $I_2$. The corresponding singular points on $CP^1$ would form the vertices of the icosahedron (centers of the dodecahedron). The automorphism group of this $K3$ will then project onto the symmetry group of the dodecahedron. Do you know this $K3$? Do you have a reference?

share|improve this question
    
I could use some help getting the URLs to these questions appear as a link in the question -RM –  Richard Montgomery Oct 1 '11 at 1:29
    
Done (also tweaked your AG tag) –  Yemon Choi Oct 1 '11 at 1:32
    
Edited only to tweak the remaining tags. –  Noam D. Elkies Oct 1 '11 at 1:56

1 Answer 1

up vote 13 down vote accepted

There's a pretty K3 with icosahedral symmetry and 12 singular fibers each of type II (so a double root of the discriminant but with additive reduction); would that do? It's $y^2 = x^3 + P(t)$ where $P$ has icosahedral symmetry. Explicitly one can take $P(t) = t^{11} - 11 t^6 - t$. This surface is isotrivial (i.e. with constant $j$-invariant, here $j=0$), and is closely related with the isotrivial surface of Chahal, Meijer, and Top, which also has $j=0$ but with $a(t) = t^{12} - 11 t^6 - 1$. Both surfaces attain the maximum of $18$ for the Mordell-Weil rank of an elliptic K3 surface over ${\bf C}(t)$. The Chahal-Meijer-Top paper is on the arXiv (9911274), and is published in Comment. Math. Univ. St. Pauli 49 (2000), 79–89. My recent student G.Zaytman studied the icosahedral surface and its Mordell-Weil lattice in the course of his thesis research.

EDIT Come to think of it, this is up to isomorphism the unique elliptic K3 surface over ${\bf C}(t)$ with icosahedral symmetries acting on the base: for the narrow Weierstrass form $y^2 = x^3 + a(t) x + b(t)$ to have icosahedral symmetry, the same must be true of the coefficients $a$ and $b$; but $a$ has degree $8$, so must vanish identically, while $b$ has degree 12 and is thus determined up to a scalar factor.

share|improve this answer
    
Is it obvious that the group action on ${\mathbb P}^1$ lifts to the $K3$ surface? if it does, then there is a ${\mathbb Z}_5$ that fixes a singular fiber, so in particular it fixes the singular point. On the other hand, the action on near a fixed point has to be analytically of the form $(x,y)\mapsto (ax, a^{-1}y)$ for $a$ a $5$-th root of 1 and I'm having trouble reconciling these two facts. –  rita Oct 1 '11 at 19:24
    
Yes, it lifts. Put the singular fiber at $t=0$ (as the formula I gave does for one of the fibers) so the surface is $y^2 = x^3 + t Q(t^5)$ for some polynomial $Q$. Then if $a^5=1$ the automorphism $t \mapsto at$ of the $t$-line lifts to $(x,y,z) \mapsto (a^2 x, a^3 y, a t)$. –  Noam D. Elkies Oct 1 '11 at 21:27
    
Noam, thanks for the Chahal et al ref. Page 4, sec. 3, par. 2 asserts that putting $P(t)=A(t^6 -b)^2$ in your representation above gives a K3 with 6 singular fibers of type IV. The corresponding 6 zeros of P lie on a hexagon so don't have the octahedral symmetry of my MO question of last week (that you'd answered). But the zeros of $P(t) = t (t^2 +1) (t^2 -1)$ form the vertices of the octahedron. Might the elliptic surface for this P be Hirzebruch's K3 with the octahedral symmetry? (How does one compute $p_g$ from $P(t)$?) –  Richard Montgomery Oct 2 '11 at 5:40
    
@Noam: thank you, now I see it. –  rita Oct 2 '11 at 11:38
1  
@Richard: That's a good thought, but no, it's not the same. Yes, it's an elliptic K3 surface (as long as $P$ has no zeros of order $6$ or more, $y^2=x^3+P(t)$ is K3 for $6 < \deg P \leq 12$), but it can be shown that if such a surface $X$ attains the upper bound of $20$ on the rank of the Néron-Severi group ${\rm NS}(X)$ then the intersection pairing on ${\rm NS}(X)$ has discriminant $-3n^2$ for some integer $n$, whereas the Hirzebruch surface has discriminant $-16$. There's more ways for a K3 surface to have octahedral symmetry than icosahedral; ... [continued due to 600-character limit] –  Noam D. Elkies Oct 4 '11 at 3:41

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.