Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This is a followup to my previous question, which asked whether the category of commutative or noncommutative C*-algebras or von Neumann algebras is equivalent to the category of commutative or noncommutative monoids in some (symmetric) monoidal category. Tom Leinster gave a complete answer for the commutative case, which turned out to be quite different from what I expected, because conditions on the underlying symmetric monoidal category were too weak.

I want to revisit this question for the opposite category of the category of smooth manifolds, which is a full subcategory of the category of commutative real algebras. This time I want to consider only additive symmetric monoidal categories.

I have in mind the classical example of the category of affine schemes, whose opposite category is equivalent to the category of commutative monoids of the category of abelian groups equipped with the standard tensor product.

Perhaps the additive structure should be compatible with the symmetric monoidal structure, which is the case for the above example. I am somewhat hesitant to require the category to be preabelian or even abelian, but I would not mind an answer that uses one of these stronger conditions.

For the category of smooth manifolds I expect the relevant additive symmetric monoidal category to be a subcategory of the category of complete locally convex nuclear Hausdorff topological vector spaces, possibly equipped with some additional structures, with the monoidal structure probably coming from the nuclear tensor product.

I am also considering the option (communicated to me by Jeff Egger) that an involutive structure might be crucial in this setting, similarly to the case of C*-algebras and von Neumann algebras. Thus I am willing to replace monoids and categories with involutive monoids and involutive categories in the above description.

Is the category of smooth manifolds equivalent to the opposite category of the category of commutative (involutive?) monoids of some additive (involutive?) symmetric monoidal category?

I am also interested in the case of commutative C*-algebras and von Neumann algebras, as well as in the noncommutative case. Restricting to compact smooth manifolds is also possible.

share|improve this question
3  
How wedded are you to considering manifolds, as opposed to manifold-like structures? Part of the reason I'm asking is that the category of manifolds is not well-behaved (as a category), and a lot of technical work is easier to carry out in slightly expanded categories. There is in particular a notion of $C^\infty$-ring, which seems close to your concerns... –  Todd Trimble Sep 30 '11 at 19:52
    
@Todd: I am not sure whether the absence of (co)limits and/or the failure of the category of smooth manifods to be cartesian closed is an issue, but I will be very happy to see a solution of this problem for any expanded category of smooth spaces. –  Dmitri Pavlov Sep 30 '11 at 22:05
1  
Dmitri, those are just some of the defects (I wasn't even thinking of failure of cartesian closure here). Anyway, interesting question! –  Todd Trimble Oct 1 '11 at 0:11

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.