MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Consider a set S of partitions not containing the empty partition (I would be happy with, say, all the partitions of size less than k, except for the empty one).

Let $U_\lambda^{(r)}$ be the zero-set in $\mathbb{C}^r$ of the Schur polynomial $s_\lambda(x_1,\cdots,x_r)$.

What is known about $\cap_{\lambda \in S} U_\lambda^{(r)}$, beyond the fact that it is symmetric under the action of $S_r$?

(I am having trouble finding information about this: all the hits are about the different question of the Schur stability of univariate polynomials, a concept based on the location of the roots of those polynomials).

share|cite|improve this question

For $k :=|\lambda| \ge r$, the statement that all $s_\lambda(x_1, \ldots, x_r)$ vanish is equivalent to all the elementary polynomials $e_j(x_1, \ldots, x_r) := \sum_{i_1 < \ldots < i_j} x_{i_1} \ldots x_{i_j}$, $j \le r$, vanish, since the latter form a basis of the algebra $\Lambda_r$. But this is true if and only if all the $x_1, \ldots, x_r$ are zero, since $e_j$ is the $y^{r-j}$ coefficient of a degree $r$ polynomial, i.e., $$ \prod_{i=1}^r (y - x_i) = \sum_{j=0}^r (-1)^j e_j(x_1, \ldots, x_r) y^{r-j}.$$ If all the $e_j$'s are zero, except $e_0 \equiv 1$, then it must be $y^r$, hence all the $x_i$'s vanish.

For $k < r$, the zero set consists of roots of polynomials of the form $y^r + c_{k+1} y^{r-k-1} + c_{k+2} y^{r-k-2} + \ldots + c_r$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Assume there is a non-trivial common zero $\xi \neq (0,\dots,0)$.

Now, to quite wikipedia: "The degree d Schur polynomials in n variables are a linear basis for the space of homogeneous degree d symmetric polynomials in n variables."

So, let $P$ be any symmetric homogeneous polynomial in $n$ variables, of degree $d$. It is now clear that $P$ is a linear combination of the Schur polynomials, hence, $P$ must be zero at $\xi.$

Edit: This seems very strange, at least when the number of equations is greater than the number of variables. For small $r$, there might be a few zeros except 0, but when the number of partitions of $r$ is greater than $r$ itself, then one cannot apriori expect a solution except 0.

share|cite|improve this answer
Re: your 2rd paragraph. Only symmetric polynomials are linear combination of Schur polynomials. – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Feb 8 '12 at 7:37
@Mariano Suárez-Alvarez : Ok, fixed. – Per Alexandersson Feb 8 '12 at 18:26

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.