MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

(Note that I've edited the main body of the question to make it clear for other readers.)

Fix a principal $G$-bundle $\rho: P \rightarrow X$ and fix a point $p \in P_x$ in the fiber above $x \in X$. If $\rho$ is equipped with a flat connection $\omega$, we get a surjective homomorphism $\pi_1(X,x) \rightarrow \text{Hol}_p(\omega)$.

  • When is the map $\pi_1(X, x) \rightarrow \text{Hol}_p(\omega) \hookrightarrow G \rightarrow \text{Inn}(G)$ surjective?

The motivation for this question comes from the fact that such a composition is surjective in the case of ``parallel transport'' of fundamental groups in $X$ along curves changing basepoints.

share|cite|improve this question
    
This question isn't very clear to me - what exactly do you mean by "force the situation above"? Also, my impression is that the only natural topology on $\pi_1(M)$ is the discrete topology. (I say that since it seems like $\pi_1(M)$ is the component group of the loop group of $M$.) – Peter Samuelson Sep 28 '11 at 4:03
    
Voting to close until the question actually makes sense. – Igor Rivin Sep 28 '11 at 9:38
    
I've made the appropriate changes to the question. Does it make sense now? – Alexander Moll Sep 29 '11 at 2:25
1  
The typical case is that the fundamental group is countable and $Inn(G)$ is uncountable in which case your map is never surjective. – Johannes Ebert Sep 29 '11 at 7:18
    
Peter, sets of connected components may have a non-trivial totally disconnected topology, e.g. the Cantor set – Fernando Muro Sep 29 '11 at 10:40

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.