Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Here's a question from Shelah's book Classification Theory. Given an order $I$, we consider cuts of the form $(A,B)$ where for all $a \in A, b \in B$ we have $a < b$ and $A \cup B = I$. The cofinality of a cut $(A,B)$ is the pair $(\lambda, \kappa)$ where $\lambda$ is the cofinality of $A$ and $\kappa$ is the cofinality of $B$ in the reverse order.

The reader is asked to show in Exercise VII.1.7 that given any order $J$ with $|J| \leq \kappa$ there is an order $I$ with $J \subseteq I$ and $|I| = \kappa$ so that if $(A,B)$ is a cut of $I$ then the cofinality of $(A,B)$ is $(\aleph_{0}, \aleph_{0})$. In other words, given any order of size at most $\kappa$, it can be expanded to an order of size $\kappa$ so that every cut has countable cofinality.

Does anyone know how to show this? In the absence of any hypothesis on $\kappa$ it is difficult to see how one could kill off all uncountable cuts in an order of size $\kappa$ without increasing the cardinality.

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 4 down vote accepted

I don´t think the statement is true as it is. If $J=\omega_1+1$ then for any $I \supseteq J$ (of whatever cardinality) you can define a cut as: $x \in A$ iff $x \in I$ and $\exists \alpha \in \omega_1 (x<\alpha) $ and $B=I \setminus A$. This cut can't have cofinality $(\omega, \omega)$.

share|improve this answer
    
But this is not a "proper" cut if the $\omega_1$ sequence has a supremum in $I$. –  François G. Dorais Sep 29 '11 at 23:32
    
Yes, this is a convincing counterexample. On a second reading, I realized that I misinterpreted the question. The point is not that the only cuts have countable cofinality, but that all cuts with cofinality $(\lambda, \kappa)$ with $\lambda$ and $\kappa$ uncountable actually have cofinality &(\lambda, \lambda)& - that is, all cuts with uncountable cofinality have the same cofinality in the lower cut and in the upper cut with the reverse order. –  nick Sep 30 '11 at 23:10
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.