MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

A well-known theorem in projective geometry states that the three Pascal lines of an arbitrary hexagon inscribed in a quadric intersect in one point. I found an algebraic reformulation, which states that for any six lines $l_i=a_ix+b_iy+c_iz$, if the quadrics $l_i^2$ are linearly dependent, then $l_1l_3$, $l_3l_5$, $l_1l_5$, $l_2l_4$, $l_2l_6$, $l_4l_6$ are linearly dependent. But I can not understand the algebraic meaning of this fact. Is it just an accident or a special case of some duality?

share|cite|improve this question

Pascal's theorem is a special case of the purely algebraic Cayley-Bacharach theorem. For a brief discussion see e.g.

share|cite|improve this answer

You might want to look at

(I am not certain that it answers your question...)

share|cite|improve this answer

Thank you very much! This is interesting article- I have read it. But what I am concerned is interpretation of the result from the perspective of geometry of space of quadrics. First, I thought it follows from the polar duality in $P^5$, but it seems it does not.

share|cite|improve this answer
You should add this as a comment instead of an answer. – Xiaolei Wu Dec 6 '11 at 3:06

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.