Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $\Omega$ be the interior of a compact set $K$ in the plane. Suppose $f$ and $g$ are continuous on $K$ and holomorphic in $\Omega$, and $|f(z)-g(z)|<|f(z)|$ for all $z\in K-\Omega$. Then $f$ and $g$ have the same number of zeros in $\Omega$.

PS: This problem is from Rudin's book in Ch.10. So, I just know some basic theorems about holomorphic functions.(I don't know anything about harmonic functions or conformal mapping, which I will learn in later chapters)

Something I tried:

Since I don't know how to solve this problem with arbitrary compact set $K$, I just assume that $K$ is a closed disc $\bar{D}(0;R)$ to simplify the problem. So $\Omega=D(0;R)$ (Actually, even if I could solve the problem in this simple case, I don't know how to solve the problem in the general case. I just make the problem simpler and see where this specific case will lead me to)

Clearly, $f$ has no zeros on $\partial\bar{D}$. Let $N$ denote the number of zeros of $f$ in $D(0;R)$ and $\gamma$ be the circle with center at $0$ and radius $R$. If I could prove that $$N=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_\gamma\frac{f'(z)}{f(z)}dz$$ (which is different from the classical Argument Principle I learnt), I could solve the simpler case.

Since $f$ is holomorphic in $D(0;R)$ and not identically zero in $D(0;R)$, the number of zeros of $f$ in $D(0;R)$ is finite. Let $r=sup\lbrace|a|:f(a)=0, a\in D(0;R)\rbrace$. Therefore, all the zeros of $f$ lie in the open disc $D(0;r)$. Pick $\rho$ such that$\rho$ such that $R>\rho>r$. Define $\gamma_\rho(\theta)=\rho e^{i\theta}$ on $[0,2\pi]$ Now, the classical Argument Principle can be used. Therefore, $$N(\rho)=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_{\gamma_\rho}\frac{f'(z)}{f(z)}dz$$ or $$N(\rho)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\frac{f'(\rho e^{i\theta})}{f(\rho e^{i\theta})}\rho e^{i\theta}d\theta$$ Now, let $\rho\to R$. Therefore, $\lim_{\rho\to R}N(\rho)=N$. However, I cannot prove that $f'$ is continuous on $\bar{D}(0;R)$, though $f'$ is really continuous in $D(0;R)$. Thus, I failed to solve the problem.

PS:This question have already been posted in math.stackexchange.com/q/65298, too!

Any hints will be appreciated.

share|improve this question
5  
Crossposted from math.SE: math.stackexchange.com/q/65298 Please wait a bit longer than just a few hours before posting here. And if you post here, please link to the other question on both sides in order to avoid duplication of efforts. –  Theo Buehler Sep 18 '11 at 2:35
2  
I vote to close; seems better for math.SE. –  quid Sep 18 '11 at 11:04
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Actually this problem is from Chapter 13 (at least in my edition, see p.266). Here is a sketch. By the conditions $f$ and $g$ do not have any zeros in $K-\Omega$. In particular, zeros do not accumulate on $\partial\Omega$, hence there are only finitely many zeros in $\Omega$ by the uniqueness principle (Corollary on p.210). Now let $M$ be a connected component of $\Omega$, it suffices to show that $f$ and $g$ have the same number of zeros in $M$. By the Theorem on p.262, $M$ is homeomorphic to the unit disk. As a result, for any $\epsilon>0$ there is a rectifiable simple closed curve $\gamma$ in $M$ such that $\gamma$ is the boundary of a simply connected open subset of $M$ which contains all the zeros of $f$ and $g$ in $M$, and the distance of $\gamma$ from $\partial M$ is less than $\epsilon$. If $\epsilon$ is sufficiently small, then $|f-g|<|f|$ on $\gamma$, hence by Rouché's theorem $f$ and $g$ have the same number of zeros in $M$.

share|improve this answer
    
Can this problem be solved only with the knowledge in Chapter 10? This problem is the exercise in Chapter 10. –  Y. Fan Sep 19 '11 at 4:28
    
Forgot to say that thank you very much for giving me such sketch –  Y. Fan Sep 19 '11 at 4:29
    
By the way, the sketch you give me is just recently what I've been thinking about to solve the problem. The basic idea is to create a path to approximate the boundary of $K$. However, It seems that I really need some more tools from later chapters. –  Y. Fan Sep 19 '11 at 4:41
    
In my edition of the book the problem is from Ch.13, namely from p.266. I only used results from earlier parts of the book, namely from p.210 and p.262. –  GH from MO Sep 19 '11 at 7:45
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.