MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $X,Y$ be locally Noetherian schemes. Let $f:X\to Y$ be a finite, surjective, and locally complete intersection morphism, i.e., locally it can be decomposed as regular immersion followed by a smooth morphism. Recall: an immersion $X\to Y$ is called a regular immersion at a point $x$ if $\mathcal{O}_{X,x}$ is isomorphic as $\mathcal{O}_{Y,y}$-module to $\mathcal{O}_{Y,y}$ modulo an ideal $I$ generated by a regular sequence of elements of $\mathcal{O}_{Y,y}$.

Question: prove that $f$ is flat. In particular, $f$ will be a simultaneously open and closed morphism.

share|cite|improve this question
Sorry, very late answer to your comment below: l.c.i implies finite flat dimension essentially because a quotient by a regular sequence has finite flat resolution (the Koszul complex) – Hailong Dao Apr 30 '10 at 0:47
This is worded like a homework problem. – Angelo Jan 15 '12 at 6:25

Work locally, assume that $f: R\to S$ is a local homomorphism. Let $\operatorname{cmd}(R) =\operatorname{dim} R-\operatorname{depth} R$ (this is the so-called Cohen-Macaulay defect of $R$). Claim: $\operatorname{cmd}$ is preserved by l.c.i maps (easy, essentially because both depth and dimension drop by one when you kill a regular element).

Now since the map $\phi: \operatorname{Spec}(S) \to \operatorname{Spec} (R)$ is finite and surjective, $\operatorname{dim} R= \operatorname{dim} S$, which combines with the last claim to show that $\operatorname{depth} R = \operatorname{depth} S$. But since l.c.i also implies finite flat dimension, we have $\operatorname{depth} R -\operatorname{depth} S = pd_RS$, so $S$ is flat over $R$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Do either of you know any good references for this stuff, other than Liu? I like the topics and style of his book, so now I'm greedy and looking for more :) – Andrew Critch Dec 2 '09 at 9:22
Andrew: Unfortunately I do not know any. If you want all the technical details of recent results on this kind of stuff, look at Lucho Avramov publications page (especially the lower half): – Hailong Dao Dec 2 '09 at 16:52
Thanks, but I am still not sure why l.c.i impies finite flat dimension – Taisong Jing Dec 3 '09 at 7:35
@Andrew Critch: I'm pretty sure this is covered in the commutative algebra section of Stacks-GIT. – Harry Gindi Apr 9 '10 at 2:51

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.