MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

My question are related with this paragraph: (page 25 of A Fibre Bundle Description of Teichüller Theory by Earle and Eells.)

Let $X$ a Riemann surface of genus g>1, if $J\in M(X)$ ($M(X)$ space of complex structures in $X$), then we have $\pi:U\rightarrow X$ smooth covering map ($U$ the upper half plane) whose cover group $\Gamma$ is Fuchsian. Then $\pi$ induces $\pi^{*}:M(X)\rightarrow M(U)$ whose imagen is denoted by $M(\Gamma)$, its elements are the $\Gamma-$invariant complex structures.

1.- Why the elements of $M(\Gamma)$ are $\Gamma-$invariant complex structures.

share|cite|improve this question
Your question 1 makes sense, but is perhaps suited to, which has a broader remit than MO. Your question 2 is completely ungrammatical, and I can't figure out what you mean. Also, what does it mean for a space of complex structures to be unitary? – David Roberts Sep 14 '11 at 2:19
@daniel, the complex structures in the image of $\pi^*$ are pullbacks of complex structures on $X$ via $\pi$. Being the pullbacks, they are $\Gamma$-invariant. – Igor Belegradek Sep 15 '11 at 15:12

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.