MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If a field has a cyclic multiplicative group, is it necessarily finite?

share|cite|improve this question
Is the product group the same as the multiplicative group ( – Ricky Demer Aug 29 '11 at 4:31
Yes, it has been edited. – Adterram Aug 29 '11 at 4:38
Do you mean: If a field is cyclic as a multiplicative group..., or If a field has a cyclic multiplicative subgroup? – Daniel Mansfield Aug 29 '11 at 5:27
It wouldn't be good to use the first expression, since the multiplicative group excludes an element of the underlying set. $ \; $ If the field has a cyclic multiplicative group, then the field's multiplicative group is cyclic, since the field has a unique multiplicative group (namely, it's multiplicative group). – Ricky Demer Aug 29 '11 at 6:07

Assume that the elements of field $F$ are 0, ${a^n}$.

Case 1: If the characteristic is not 2. Then$1 \ne - 1$, therefore$ - 1 = {a^n}(n \ne 0)$ and ${a^{2n}} = 1$. Hence we conclude that it is finite.

Case 2: If the characteristic is 2. First we have $1 + a = {a^s}$and we can assume that $s \ne 1$ , otherwise the field is trivial. Then we conclude that $a$ is algebraic over ${F_2}$and ${\rm{ F= }}{F_2}(a)$. We can set the degree of the minimal polynomial of is n , then all the elements of $F$ can be written as a linear combination of $1,a,{a^2} \cdots {a^{n - 1}}$over${F_2}$ , but the cardinal number of all such element is finite, which concludes the proof.

share|cite|improve this answer

Yes; it suffices to rule out that the multiplicative group is $\mathbb{Z}$. The field can't have characteristic zero, since $\mathbb{Q}^\times$ is not finitely generated (so not contained in $\mathbb{Z}$). If it has characteristic $p \neq 2$, then it contains $\mathbb{F}_p$, where $\mathbb{F}_p^\times$ has torsion of order greater than 2 and so is also not contained in $\mathbb{Z}$. If $p = 2$, then the field can't contain $\mathbb{F}_4$ for the same reason, so if it's not $\mathbb{F}_2$, it must be transcendental over it. But $\mathbb{F}_2(x)^\times$ is not finitely generated again, so not contained in $\mathbb{Z}$ either.

share|cite|improve this answer
The same argument proves the stronger claim that, if the multiplicative group is finitely generated then the field is finite. – Gjergji Zaimi Aug 29 '11 at 5:55

The following proof is a short proof of the stronger claim stated by @Gjergji-Zaimi :

The main ingredient is the fact that if finitely generated $\mathbb{Z}$-algebra is a field, then it is a finite field. (this is essentially equivalent to Nullstellensatz).

If the multiplicative group of a field $F$ is finitely generated then $F$ would be a finitely generetad $\mathbb{Z}$-algebra, hence $F$ is a finite field.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.