Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The problem of Schauder decomposition of a given Banach space seems to play an important role in the geometry of Banach spaces, especially when one is interested in finite dimensional Schauder decompositions (FDD).

I am wondering if the Schauder decomposition can be regarded (in special cases) as the internal counterpart to infinite sums of Banach spaces.

Let me consider two cases: $C(K)$ and $L^p(\mu)$.

Suppose that $E$ is either $C(K)$ space for some compactum $K$ or $L^p(\mu)$ for some measure $\mu$.

Let $(E_n)$ be a sequence of complemented subspaces of $E$ such that for each integer $n$ $$E_1\oplus \ldots \oplus E_n \cap E_{n+1}=\{0\}.$$

In the $C(K)$ case assume that each $E_n$ is isomorphic to $c_0$ and in the latter one, $E_n$ is isomorphic to $\ell^p$.

Define $F$ to be the closed linear span of all $E_n$. Is the family $$\{E_1\oplus \ldots \oplus E_n\colon n\in \mathbb{N}\}$$ a blocking Schauder decomposition for $F$?

Is $F$ isomorphic to $c_0$ / $\ell^p$ ?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

No. You need the projections $Q_n$ onto $E_1\oplus \dots E_n$ from $F$ to be uniformly bounded in order for $(E_n)$ to be a Schauder decomposition for $F$. Even then $F$ need not be isomorphic to $c_0$/$\ell_p$. However, if the $Q_n$ are uniformly bounded from $\ell_p$, then by taking limits in the weak operator topology you get (when $1<p<\infty$) a projection from $\ell_p$ onto $F$ and hence $F$ is isomorphic to $\ell_p$. That is not the case for $p=1$ or in the $C(K)$ case. It is true in the $c_0$ case, because you get by using the weak* operator topology in $\ell_\infty$ an operator from $c_0$ into $F^{**}\subset \ell_\infty$ that is the identity on $F$, which implies that $F$ is a $\mathcal{L}_\infty$ space, and every $\mathcal{L}_\infty$ subspace of $c_0$ is isomorphic to $c_0$.

If you do not understand, email me questions and I will explain when I have more time.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you. You think about $\ell^\infty$ as a W*-algebra but I don't know operator techniques you use. Certainly, I'd like to ask some further questions... –  TMK Aug 24 '11 at 21:23

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.