MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

For reasons arising in algebraic topology, I'm wanting to better understand the relations between two functors from groups to abelian groups, $\mathbb{Z}[\cdot]$ and $\operatorname{ab}$; group ring and abelianization.

Specifically, we can extend the homomorphism $G\to \operatorname{ab}(G)$ to an additive map $\mathbb{Z}[G]\to \operatorname{ab}(G)$, and this map is clearly natural. It seems too vague to ask "what should I do with this next?", so instead the question is

What references are there that consider this natural transformation?

For instance, I'd be immensely pleased if this is a good way to start a free resolution of $\operatorname{ab}$ without forgetting too much about $G$, and to learn what's the natural way to continue... but I'm not picky! You'll understand when I complain that automatic search-engines aren't too helpful in looking for anonymous natural transformations.

Thanks.

share|cite|improve this question
    
I'm curious to hear more about how this relates to algebraic topology. – David White Aug 15 '11 at 14:19
2  
Oh, well, if $X$ is a good-enough space, and $G=\pi_1(X)$, then $\operatorname{ab}G=H_1(X)$ (Poincaré!), while $Z[G]=H_0 (\Omega X)$. We can do better: there's another endofunctor $h$ on spaces such that the two group functors in the question correspond to the connected components of $h\Omega$ and $\Omega h$, respectively; one can even deduce a natural transformation $h\Omega\to \Omega h$ that lifts my "anonymous" transformation... but I'm wanting to focus on the algebraic side of this for now. – some guy on the street Aug 15 '11 at 17:05

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.