MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm just curious about the polynomial $\det (x_k^iy_k^j)_{0\leq i\leq d-1, 0\leq j\leq e-1, 1\leq k\leq de}$ (determinant of $de\times de$-matrix, $x_k$, $y_k$ are all independent variables). Is anything known about its factorization on irreducible polynomials?

The question is based only on my own interest.

share|cite|improve this question
Uhm, a matrix with three indices? – Federico Poloni Aug 5 '11 at 7:11
I think, rows are indexed by pairs (i,j) and columns by k – Fedor Petrov Aug 5 '11 at 7:16
Please change either question or title. This polynomial is not irreducible for sure, it is divisible by x_1. – Fedor Petrov Aug 5 '11 at 7:22
@Fedor: Done! Thanks! – zroslav Aug 5 '11 at 12:34

Geometrically, your question is the following. Let $v_{d-1}:\mathbb{P}^1 \to \mathbb{P}^{d-1}$ and $v_{e-1}:\mathbb{P}^1 \to \mathbb{P}^{e-1}$ be the Veronese embeddings. Let $s_{d-1,e-1}:\mathbb{P}^{d-1}\times \mathbb{P}^{e-1} \to \mathbb{P}^{de-1}$ be the Segre embedding. Consider the composition $c$, i.e., $s_{d-1,e-1}\circ (v_{d-1},v_{e-1}):\mathbb{P}^1 \times \mathbb{P}^1 \to \mathbb{P}^{de-1}$. The composition is "linearly nondegenerate", i.e., for a general choice of $de$ points $(x_k,y_k)$ of the domain $\mathbb{P}^1\times \mathbb{P}^1$, the image points in $\mathbb{P}^{de-1}$ span the target. And you are now considering the divisor $\Delta$ in $(\mathbb{P}^1\times \mathbb{P}^1)^{de}$ where the image points are linearly degenerate. You want to know if this divisor is reducible.

I claim $\Delta$ is irreducible. Choose some index $k=1,\dots,de$ and consider the projection $\pi_k:(\mathbb{P}^1\times \mathbb{P}^1)^{de} \to (\mathbb{P}^1\times \mathbb{P}^1)^{de-1}$ which forgets the $k^{\text{th}}$ component. Consider the restriction $\pi_k:\Delta \to (\mathbb{P}^1 \times \mathbb{P}^1)^{de-1}$. Consider a generic point in the target $(\mathbb{P}^1\times \mathbb{P}^1)^{de-1}$. This parameterizes $de-1$ points in $\mathbb{P}^1\times \mathbb{P}^1$ whose images in $\mathbb{P}^{de-1}$ span a generic hyperplane $H$. The intersection of $H$ with $c(\mathbb{P}^1\times \mathbb{P}^1)$ is a generic curve $\Gamma$ of bidegree $(d-1,e-1)$ in $\mathbb{P}^1\times \mathbb{P}^1$, which is irreducible. For the $k^{\text{th}}$ point of $\mathbb{P}^1\times \mathbb{P}^1$, the total collection of $de$ points are linearly independent in $\mathbb{P}^{de-1}$ unless the $k^{\text{th}}$ point maps into $H$, i.e., unless the $k^{\text{th}}$ point is in the irreducible curve $\Gamma$.

What this proves is that there is a unique irreducible component of $\Delta$ which dominates $(\mathbb{P}^1\times \mathbb{P}^1)^{de-1}$. And for any component which does not dominate, the fiber dimension over its image must be precisely $2$ and the image must be a divisor, i.e., for some codimension $1$ subset of $(\mathbb{P}^1\times \mathbb{P}^1)^{de-1}$, every choice of $k^{\text{th}}$ points makes the total collection of $de$ points linearly degenerate. Since $c(\mathbb{P}^1\times \mathbb{P}^1)$ spans $\mathbb{P}^{de-1}$, the image is contained in no hyperplane. So the only possibility is that the collection of $de-1$ points is itself linearly dependent. But, we expect $de-1$ points in $\mathbb{P}^{de-1}$ to be linearly independent in codimension $2$, not in codimension $1$. Of course the "expected codimension" may be wrong, but since this situation is so homogeneous, I bet it is easy to prove the expected codimension equals the actual codimension. I will think about it a bit more and post soon.

Edited. Okay, by the above, we have only to prove that for every effective Cartier divisor $D$ in $(\mathbb{P}^1\times \mathbb{P}^1)^{de}$, i.e., $D$ is an irreducible component of $\Delta$, there exists an index $k=1,\dots,de$, such that for the projection $\pi_k:(\mathbb{P}^1\times \mathbb{P}^1)^{de} \to (\mathbb{P}^1\times \mathbb{P}^1)^{de-1}$, $\pi_k:D \to (\mathbb{P}^1\times \mathbb{P}^1)^{de-1}$ is dominant, i.e., the intersection of $D$ with a general fiber $F_k$ is nonzero Now the Picard group of $(\mathbb{P}^1\times \mathbb{P}^1)^{de}$ is $\mathbb{Z}^{2de}$, i.e., every invertible sheaf is of the form $\text{pr}_1^*\mathcal{O}(a_1,b_1)\otimes \dots \otimes \text{pr}_{de}^*\mathcal{O}(a_{de},b_{de})$ for some choice of integers $a_l,b_l$. If the divisor $D$ is effective, then its corresponding invertible sheaf has every $a_l,b_l$ nonnegative. And the fiber $F_k$ is isomorphic to $\mathbb{P}^1\times \mathbb{P}^1$. The restriction of the invertible sheaf to $F_k$ is isomorphic to $\mathcal{O}(a_k,b_k)$. In particular, the intersection of $D$ with $F_k$ can be empty only if $a_k$ and $b_k$ equal $0$. But if this holds for every choice of $k$, then the invertible sheaf os just $\mathcal{O}$ which forces $D$ to be empty.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.