MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $A$ be an associative algebra over a field. Then $A$ can be regarded as a Lie algebra via the Lie bracket defined by $[a,b]=ab-ba$ for every $a,b\in A$. The algebra $A$ is called Lie locally nilpotent if it is locally nilpotent as a Lie algebra. Also, $A$ is said to be locally Lie nilpotent if every finitely generated associative subalgebra of $A$ is nilpotent as a Lie algebra. Clearly, if $A$ is locally Lie nilpotent then it is Lie locally nilpotent. Is the converse true?

share|cite|improve this question
Of course, my question is equivalent to the following. Suppose that a finitely generated associative algebra $A$ is locally nilpotent as a Lie algebra. Is $A$ necessary nilpotent as a Lie algebra? – Salvatore Siciliano Aug 5 '11 at 15:27
It maybe that the following paper: P. Etingof, J. Kim, X. Ma, On universal Lie nilpotent associative algebras, J. Algebra 321 (2009), N2, 697-703 DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2008.09.042; arXiv:0805.1909, and/or references therein, are relevant. – Pasha Zusmanovich Aug 20 '11 at 16:12
Hi Pasha, thank you for pointing out this reference. I took a look at that paper, however a satisfactory answer to my question is not present there. – Salvatore Siciliano Aug 20 '11 at 16:59

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.