MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

firstly i thank you for taking interest in my post but i am new here so if i have made some mistakes or done something which is out of place please point problem is- we know that the cantor middle one-thirds set is uncountable.(i know the proof of that) i am going to prove it is countable,please point out the mistake in my argument here. the cantor middle one thirds set is created by eliminating open intervals from [0,1]. all these intervals are disjoint,hence the cantor set is made up of the boundary points of these intervals and each interval has two boundary points and the number of intervals are countable.hence the cantor set is countable. this is my argument. i am seriously confused here.please help out.

share|cite|improve this question

closed as too localized by Felipe Voloch, Yemon Choi, Qiaochu Yuan, Andrés E. Caicedo, Simon Thomas Jul 30 '11 at 22:15

This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet. For help making this question more broadly applicable, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

up vote 5 down vote accepted

There are points in the Cantor set that are not endpoints of any of the removed intervals. For example $1/4$ is such a point.

share|cite|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.