Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $X$ be a Voevodsky's motif (over a perfect field) that belongs to the positive part of the homotopy $t$-structure (i.e. its cohomology as an object of $D^-(ShSmCor)$ is zero in negative degrees). Is the same true for $X(1)$?

This seems to be a difficult question, and I will try to express my ideas about it. The Beilinson-Soule conjecture predicts that the answer is positive for $X=\mathbb{Z}(j)$, $j\ge 0$. Moreover, for any geometric motif $X$ this conjecture together with Poincare duality yields that there exists a constant $c_X$ such that $X(i)[c_X]$ is $t$-positive for any $i\ge 0$.

Besides, one can certainly consider motives either with $\mathbb{Z}/l\mathbb{Z}$-coefficients or with $\mathbb{Q}$-ones in this question. For the first of this possibilities, one can replace the Beilinson-Soule conjecture with the Bloch-Kato one (so the statements above become unconditional). Yet the Bloch-Kato conjecture does not seem to answer my question.

I would be deeply grateful for any ideas or (counter)examples for my question.

More generaly, it would be interesting to understand how much negative cohomology can the tensor product of two $t$-positive motives have.

share|improve this question
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.