I'm interested in Lee's modification of Khovanov homology, which I'll denote $\operatorname{Kh}_{\operatorname{Lee}}^\ast$. Below $L$ is a link in $\mathbb R^3$.

The groups $\operatorname{Kh}_{\operatorname{Lee}}^\ast(L)$ for a link $L$ are very simple: there is an isomorphism:

$$\bigoplus_{\text{orientations of }L}\mathbb Q\to\operatorname{Kh}_{\operatorname{Lee}}^\ast(L)$$

I write the left hand side as I do and not simply as $\mathbb Q^{\oplus 2^{\left|L\right|}}$ because given an orientation of $L$ (and a diagram of $L$), there is in some sense a natural choice of element of $\operatorname{Kh}_{\operatorname{Lee}}^\ast(L)$ (and these elements form a basis of $\operatorname{Kh}_{\operatorname{Lee}}^\ast(L)$). However, this map *not* natural in the sense of being functorial.

But it's really really close to being functorial! Rasmussen proved (see Khovanov homology and the slice genus Proposition 4.1) that if we identify $\operatorname{Kh}_{\operatorname{Lee}}^\ast(L)$ with $\bigoplus_{\text{orientations of }L}\mathbb Q$, then under a cobordism from $L_1$ to $L_2$, a orientation on $L_1$ is sent to a linear combination of the orientations on $L_2$ which extend to an orientation of the cobordism agreeing with the input orientation on $L_1$. This should be viewed as a sort of approximate functoriality, and the result has been slightly refined by Rasmussen here.

My question is: has $\operatorname{Kh}_{\operatorname{Lee}}^\ast$ been calculated as a functor? In other words, do we know a canonical way of mapping $\bigoplus_{\text{orientations of }L}\mathbb Q$ to $\operatorname{Kh}_{\operatorname{Lee}}^\ast$ so that the maps associated to arbitrary cobordisms are described elementarily in terms of orientations?

This doesn't seem to be a deep problem; it comes down to writing down the generators explicitly in the chain complex defining $\operatorname{Kh}_{\operatorname{Lee}}^\ast(L)$, and checking what happens when we do a Reidemeister move or Morse move. However the calculations are kind of messy, and this is presumably why Rasmussen didn't pursue the point further (at least, not that I am aware of). But the last paper of his referred to above was in 2005, so I'm guessing that someone has probably straightened this out since then. I've been unsuccessful in finding a reference, though.