Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Hi there, I am struggling with a theorem about truncated Dirichlet series. I am trying to prove the following theorem:

Let $(a_n)_n \subset \mathbb{C}$ and $N \in \mathbb{N}$. Then $\sup_{t \in \mathbb{R}} \vert \sum_{n=1}^N a_n n^{-it} \vert = \sup_{\Re s \ge 0} \vert \sum_{n=1}^N a_n n^{-s} \vert$.

I think the trick is to use the maximum modulus principle for holomorphic functions (a holomorphic function, continuous up to the boundary attains its maximum on the boundary). Using this for the domain $-a < \Im s < a, 0 < \Re s < b$ could lead to the answer ($a,b \to \infty$), but how do I show that such a truncated Dirichlet series attains its maximum on the left border?

I would appreciate any hint on the proof or reference to any literature.

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Observe that $\vert \sum_{n=1}^N a_n n^{-s} \vert$ is bounded in the half-plane $\Re(s)\geq 0$, and it is very small for $\Re(s)$ large. As a result, there is a strip $0\leq\Re(s)\leq b$ such that the supremum here is the same as in the half-plane, but the supremum on the right edge $\Re(s)=b$ is much smaller. Now your statement follows from the Phragmén-Lindelöf theorem applied to this strip.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you for your hint. After all I arrived at the Phragmén-Lindelöf principle for sectors. I think this suits my needs a bit better. –  scus Jul 21 '11 at 9:09
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.