Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Hello.

[Edits between brackets.]

Does the [1-]category of [elementary] toposes [with logical morphisms] admit any [1-]colimits ?

[By colimit I mean initial object in the category of outgoing cocones. I'm afraid I don't know what pseudo-colimits, bicolimits or strict 2-limits are, but I can say that I'm not interested by any 2-categorical aspect of my question (at least, for now), just by the 1-categorical one.]

Any reference would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks for any answer and please forgive me for my pityful english.

share|improve this question
    
you said you mean elementary toposes, but which 1-cells: geometric morphisms? logical? and, which type of colimits: pseudo-colimits? bicolimits? strict 2-limits? –  Eduardo Pareja Tobes Jul 20 '11 at 16:23
    
Logical morphisms preserve logic, so the coproduct of a topos that satisfies some proposition $p$ with another topos that satisfies $\neg p$ would have to satisfy $p\land \neg p$. –  Wouter Stekelenburg Jul 21 '11 at 7:48

2 Answers 2

$\mathbf{Log}$, the category of elementary topoi and logical morphisms which preserve everything on the nose is cocomplete; in

Eduardo J Dubuc, GM Kelly - A presentation of topoi as algebraic relative to categories or graphs - Journal of Algebra (website)

this category $\mathbf{Log}$ is shown to be the category of algebras of a finitary monad on $\mathbf{Cat}$; it looks like you can even get this over $\mathbf{Grph}$, like the presentation of cartesian closed categories monadic over graphs in Lambek-Scott intro to higher-order categorical logic. This implies then that it is cocomplete, see the nLab page on colimits in categories of algebras, for example.

For the sake of completeness, a nice account (including explicit constructions) of 2-limits in $\mathbf{Log}$ as a locally groupoidal 2-category (1-cells the standard notion of logical morphism, 2-cells between them restricted to be isomorphisms) is given in chapter III of Steve Awodey's PhD thesis,

S Awodey - Logic in topoi: functorial semantics for higher-order logic - available from his website

share|improve this answer

You should consult section B3 Of the Elephant by Johnstone. My understanding is that the 2-category of Grothendieck toposes (over sets) has all small colimits. This holds more generally for bounded toposes over a topos with natural numbers object.

share|improve this answer
    
Just to make things clear: I presume that you are talking about 2-colimits. –  André Henriques Jul 20 '11 at 15:30
    
Yes, I that is what I was trying to get at when I said the 2-category of Grothendieck toposes. –  Benjamin Steinberg Jul 20 '11 at 16:11
    
Thank you. I'm sorry I haven't said I was talking about 1-colimits. –  Funny clown Jul 20 '11 at 16:39

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.