MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $S$ be a spin representation of the Euclidean spin group $Spin(d)$ and let ${\mathbb R}^d$ be Euclidean $d$-space with $Spin(d)$ action on it in the canonical way, via the 2:1 cover to $SO(d)$. (I am being careful here: A spin rep.'', notthe spin rep.'')

Is there, for all $d$, an onto quadratic $Spin(d)$-equivariant map $S \to {\mathbb R}^d$? If so, is there a `universal' ($d$-independent) construction of this map?

MOTIVATION: For $d=2, 3$ I know these maps. They are famous in celestial mechanics and yield the
standard regularizations of the Kepler problem, or, what is the same, of binary collisions in the classical N-body problem. They turn Kepler for negative energies into a harmonic oscillator.

Case $d=2$. I take $Spin(2)$ to also be $S^1$, but wrapped `twice' around $S^1 = SO(2)$. $S = {\mathbb C}$. The quadratic map is $w \to w^2$. This is the Levi-Civita regularization.

Case $d= 3$. This is the standard Hopf map ${\mathbb C}^2 \to {\mathbb R}^3$, or if you prefer, from the quaternions ${\mathbb H }$ to ${\mathbb R}^3$, sending $q$ to $q k \bar q$. The astronomers call this Kuustanheimo-Steifel regularization.

WHERE I'VE LOOKED SO FAR: I tried to make sense out of Deligne's discussion on spinors in the AMS two-volume set from some Princeton year on string theory from a decade or so ago. I understand that over the complexes, there is either exactly one or exactly two spin representations, depending on the parity of $d$. So even there , we don't get a `universal' d-dependent map. Over the reals things decompose in a rather complicated dimension dependent way (mod 8 probably) and there is no clear choice. I also looked in Reese Harvey's book which I find too baroque and signature depend to penetrate.

Case $d=4$. Here I am not sure. But I know $Spin(4) = SU(2) \times SU(2)$ which I can think of as two copies of the unit quaternions, each acting on ``its own'' ${\mathbb H}$. I guess in this case I better take $S = {\mathbb H} \times {\mathbb H}$ Then I get the desired quadratic map ${\mathbb H} \times {\mathbb H} \to {\mathbb H} = {\mathbb R}^4$ as $(q_1, q_2) \mapsto q_1 \bar q_2$.

share|cite|improve this question

The answer is no.

For $Spin(5)\simeq USp(4)$, the spin representation of $Spin(5)$ is the defining representation $\mathbf{4}$ of $USp(4)$. The tensor product $\mathbf{4}\otimes \mathbf{4}$ decomposes as $$\mathbf{1}\oplus\mathbf{5}\oplus\mathbf{10}.$$ The vector representation of $SO(5)$ is this $\mathbf{5}$, but it's in the antisymmetric part of this tensor product decomposition: $$\wedge^2\mathbf{4} = \mathbf{1}\oplus\mathbf{5}$$ The $\mathbf{1}$ is there, because of the definition of $USp(4)$.

So, there's no quadratic $Spin(5)$-equivariant map $\mathbf{4}\to\mathbf{5}$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you very much Yuji. Could you give me a reference for what $USp(4)$ means and for the isomorphism you began with? -Richard – Richard Montgomery Jul 19 '11 at 4:27
@Richard Montgomery: Sometimes it is useful to denote $Sp(n)$ as $Usp(2n)$, for any integer $n$. The isomorphism between $Spin(5)$ and $Sp(2)$ is reviewed in section 2 of the following paper by Salamon, – Giuseppe Jul 23 '11 at 15:56

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.