MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $\sigma\subset |\mathcal{O} _{\mathbb{P} _{\mathbb{C}}^N}(2)|$ be an $N-$dimensional linear systems of quadrics on $\mathbb{P} _{\mathbb{C}}^N$ ($N\geq 4$), $F:\mathbb{P} _{\mathbb{C}} ^N\dashrightarrow \mathbb{P} _ {\mathbb{C}}^ N$ the rational map associated to $\sigma$, and $Q\in \sigma$ a fixed smooth quadric such that $F|_{Q}:Q\dashrightarrow \mathbb{P} _{\mathbb{C}}^{N-1}$ is birational.

Is $F$ birational?

share|cite|improve this question
Nice question! Why do you consider$N\ge 4$ (and say, not $N=2,3$)? Where does this question come from? – Dmitri Jul 17 '11 at 14:19
actually $N\geq 4$ can be ignored... – gio Jul 17 '11 at 15:57
Ok, $N=2$ works, I guess you know this. Do you know if for $N=3$ the answer to your question is positive? (I have not checked yet). The more information you give on the question, better it is (at least for me)! – Dmitri Jul 17 '11 at 21:30
Dmitri, I don't see how it works for $N=2$. Can you include your argument? – Sándor Kovács Jul 17 '11 at 21:42
Note that resolving the rational maps $F$ and $F| _ Q$, is easy to see that the answer to my question is positive if the base scheme $X$ of $F$ is smooth and irreducible. Also, with less assumptions on $X$, my question is essentially equivalent to this… – gio Jul 18 '11 at 8:21

This is a bit too long for a comment, but since it was requested, below a positive answer in the case $N=2$ is given. This might also help to understand the question in the simplest case.

So we start with a smooth quadric $Q=0$ in $\mathbb P^2$ and two more quadrics $Q_1=0$, $Q_2=0$ such that the non-fixed locus of intersection of $Q$ with the linear system $Q_1+tQ_2=0$ is a single point (so the corresponding map $Q\to \mathbb P^1\supset t$ is degree one, i.e. birational). Such situation can happen only if both $Q_1$ and $Q_2$ intersect $Q$ at the same set consisting of three points, or two points of which one is with multiplicity 2, or at one point with multiplicity $3$. Let us denote this set by $x$. Then it is clear that for any generic pencil in the family generated by $Q,Q_1,Q_2$ the fixed locus is $x$ plus one point. If you translate this into the notations of the original problem you see that the map from $\mathbb P^2$ is birational.

share|cite|improve this answer
I see I missed the condition that $Q\in\sigma$! – Sándor Kovács Jul 17 '11 at 22:29

Nice question. I think that the answer is yes and more general. I have never seen this but seems natural.

${\bf Lemma}$ Let $f\colon \mathbb{P}^n_{\mathbb{C}}\to \mathbb{P}^n_{\mathbb{C}}$ be a rational map of degree $d$, given by $(x_0:\dots:x_n)\to (f_0:\dots:f_n)$, where the $f_i$ are homogeneous of degree $d$.

Suppose that the hypersurface $H\subset \mathbb{P}^n_{\mathbb{C}}$ given $f_0=0$ is irreducible and that the map from $H$ to $\mathbb{P}^{n-1}_{\mathbb{C}}$ given by the restriction (i.e. $(x_0:\dots:x_n)\to (f_1:\dots:f_n)$ on $H$) is birational.

Then, the map $f$ is birational.

${\bf Proof}$ Let $\sigma$ be the linear system associated, which corresponds to hypersurfaces of $\mathbb{P}^n$ of equation $\sum_{i=0}^n a_i f_i=0$. The restriction being birational, the intersection of $n-1$ general elements of $\sigma$ with $H$ give one mobile point, and a non-mobile part that we call $R$. Since every member of $\sigma$ contains $R$ and because elements have all the same degree, the intersection of $n$ general elements of $\sigma$ gives $R$, plus exactly one mobile point (the last part follows from Bézout). This shows that $f$ is birational.

${\bf Remark:}$ We could also view $R$ as a set of points, curves,... with some multiplicities and use intersection form on the blow-up.

share|cite|improve this answer
I do not understand your proof, but certainly the statement "every member of $\sigma$ contains $H$" is not true. – gio Aug 13 '12 at 6:02
Yes, sorry for the two missprints. I exchanged $H$ with $R$. It is almost the same argument as Dmitri, but in dimension $n$. In dimension $2$ and for quadrics, the set $R$ consists of $3$ points. In dimension $3$ for quadrics, it consists of $7$ points, or maybe a line and $5$ points, ... – Jérémy Blanc Aug 13 '12 at 6:49
To me this shows that $f$ is birational only if $H$ is general in $\sigma$, but I have requested that it is special. Please let me know if you agree. – gio Aug 13 '12 at 10:42
I dont see why you mean this. I just assumed $H$ to be irreducible. Where is the problem in the argument? – Jérémy Blanc Aug 13 '12 at 21:22

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.