MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

My question pertains to exercise II-16 in Eisenbud and Harris' "The geometry of Schemes". For an algebraically closed field $K$ the question is as follows:

Consider zero-dimensional subschemes $\Gamma \subset \mathbb{A}_K^4$ of degree 21 such that $$V(m^3)\subset\Gamma \subset V(m^4)$$ where $m$ is the maximal ideal of the origin in $\mathbb{A}_K^4$. Show that there is an 84-dimensional family of such subschemes, and conclude that in general one is not a limit of a reduced scheme.

What does it mean for a family of subschemes to have dimension 84? I can only think it means up to isomorphism there are 84 such subschemes, but this doesn't seem to work.

share|cite|improve this question
Probably this means that the inclusions $\Gamma \to \mathbb{A}$ glue to a morphism $X \to Y \times \mathbb{A}^4$, where $X$ has dimension $84$ and the fiber of $y \times \mathbb{A}^4$ is $\Gamma_y$. So you have to find a scheme $Y$ which parameterizes $\Gamma$. But this is really just a guess! – Martin Brandenburg Jul 12 '11 at 15:27
Martin's comment is correct. Note that the family $Y$ will also have dimension $84$, and $X$ will be a finite, flat, degree $21$ cover of $Y$. Hint: $Y$ should be a certain Grassmanian... – Daniel Erman Jul 12 '11 at 18:05
I think one should have an $84$ dimensional scheme $X$ and a closed subscheme $Y$ in $X \times \mathbb{A}^4$, so that if $\pi: Y \to X$ denotes the morphism induced from $p_1: X \times \mathbb{A}^4 \to X$ then $\pi^{-1}(x)$ for $x \in X$ (a closed point), which is naturally a closed subscheme of$\mathbb{A}^4$, should be a subscheme of the form $\Gamma$. Moreover, all these fibres should be distinct. The technical way to say this is that the corresponding Hilbert scheme has dimension at least $84$. – ulrich Jul 12 '11 at 18:06
up vote 7 down vote accepted

Such a subscheme is given by an ideal $I$ such that $m^4 \subset I \subset m^3$. In fact, any vector subspace in $m^3$ containing $m^4$ is an ideal (this is a simple exercise). Since $\dim O/m^3 = 15$ and $\dim O/m^4 = 35$, and we are interested in subspaces $I \subset O$ such that $\dim O/I = 21$, that is in subspaces $I/m^4$ of dimension $35 - 21 = 14$ of the space $m^3/m^4$ of dimension $35 - 15 = 20$. So, the family in question is just the Grassmannian $Gr(14,20)$. Its dimension is $14(20-14) = 14\cdot 6 = 84$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you very much - I think a lack of familiarity with Grassmannians didn't help! – Tait Jul 13 '11 at 13:43

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.