Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $S$ be a compact R.S of genus $\geq 2$. In the paper "Stable and unitary vector bundles on compact Riemann surfaces" (by Narasimhan and Seshadri), they claim that there is a branched covering map from the upper half plane to $S$ which is ramified at exactly one point (with index $N$) (i.e. $S$ is the quotient of $\mathbb{H}$ by the group $\langle A_i, B_i, C \vert \Pi [A_i, B_i] = C, [A_i,C] = [B_i, C] = I, C^N=I \rangle$). I am not able to access the reference (Grothendieck) pointed out in that paper. Is there any other reference (or any easy proof of this?) ? Also, does a similar fact hold for non-compact Riemann surfaces (compact minus a finite collection of points).

share|improve this question
I am not sure about the group you wrote down there. It looks like a central extension of the fundamental group of a Riemann surface by $\mathbb{Z}$. –  Charlie Frohman Jul 9 '11 at 22:38
Indeed it is a central extension of the fundamental group. –  Vamsi Jul 10 '11 at 0:13

2 Answers 2

up vote 10 down vote accepted

From your group-theoretic description, it seems to me that you are asking for a covering $S' \to S$ which is only ramified over one point of $S$, and the ramification index of each point of the inverse image divides $N$. So, Felipe's construction should work.

Here is a more direct construction. Suppose that $S$ is compact. Pick a point $p\in S$; the fundamental group of $S\smallsetminus \{p\}$ is the free group on $2N$ generators $A_1, \dots, A_g$, $B_1, \dots, B_g$; the product $C = \prod_{i=1}^g[A_i, B_i]$ represents a small loop around $p$. Consider the homomorphism $\pi_1(S\smallsetminus \{p\})\to \mathrm{S}_{2N}$ that sends $A_1$ into $(1 \dots N)$, $B_1$ into $(1 \dots 2N)$, and all the other $A_i$ and $B_i$ into the identity. It is easy to see that $C$ goes into $(1 \dots N)(N+1 \dots 2N)$, and that this homomorphism has transitive image. Hence the corresponding ramified cover $S' \to S$ has two ramification points over $p$, each of index $N$.

When $S$ is non-compact, then the small loop $C$ is part of a free set of generators of $\pi_1(S\smallsetminus \{p\}$, and the construction is even easier (for example, you can easily construct a cyclic cover $S' \to S$ of degree $N$ which is totally ramified over $p$, and nowhere else; this is impossible in the compact case).

share|improve this answer

Take a finite cover $S'$ of $S$ ramified at only one point $P$. Then $\mathbb{H} \to S' \to S$ is the map you want, where the first map just exhibits the universal cover of $S'$ and is unramified. To construct $S'$, first take the unramified cover $S_1$ of $S$ obtained by pulling back the map multiplication-by-2 on the Jacobian. The pre-image of $P$ in $S_1$ can then be split in two subsets of same cardinality such that there is a function on $S_1$ with simple poles on the first subset and simple zeros on the second and no other. Now take the $N$-th root of this function to get $S'$.

This construction is part of the Kodaira-Parshin trick. I have no idea if that is what Narashiman and Seshadri had in mind or if there is an easier construction.

share|improve this answer
Thanks! I apologise for my question, but this won't work for a compact R.S minus a finite number of points would it? If it doesn't, then is there an analogue? Also, would the branching index of $S^{'}$ not be $N$ times the number of sheets in $S_1$? –  Vamsi Jul 10 '11 at 0:11
I didn't think about the non-compact case, I don't know. Also, re-reading my answer and your follow-up question, there is a problem. Indeed, the ramification is on $N$ times the number of sheets in $S_1$ points. If we could somehow reverse the order of the arrows $S' \to S_1 \to S$ it would be OK, but I don't think that's right, the cover is Galois but not necessarily abelian. –  Felipe Voloch Jul 10 '11 at 0:22

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.