Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

It is well known that there exists three and four manifolds that do not admit an Einstein metric, but I wonder if this question is still open for manifolds of dimension higher than four. That is, does anyone know of a compact n-manifold, $n>4$, that does not admit an Einstein metric?

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 12 down vote accepted

No one knows this. Here is a citation from Gromov's beautiful article: http://www.ihes.fr/~gromov/topics/SpacesandQuestions.pdf

Page 19.

Following Alex we (I speak for myself) are lead to the pessimistic conclusion that there is no chance for a distinguished $g_{best}$ for $n\ge 5$ and "natural" metrics, e.g. Einstein $G$, $Ri(g)=\lambda g$ for $\lambda<0$, must be chaotically scattered in the vastness of $G$ with no meaningful link between geometry and topology (This does not preclude, but rather predicts, the existence of such metrics, e.g. Einstein, on all $V$ if dimension $\ge 5$: the problem is there may be too many of them)

share|improve this answer
add comment

In general, for dimensions $n>5$ we dont have topological obstructions to the existence of Einstein metrics (like as Hitchin-Thorpe inequality when $n=4$).

However, there exist compact homogeneous Riemannian manifolds with no $G$-invariant Einstein metrics. In this case we work on cosets $G/K$ of a compact Lie group $G$ and we consider the Einstein equation $Ric = c \cdot g$ for a $G$-invariant Riemannian metric on $M=G/K$. For such a metric the Einstein equation reduces to a polynomial system and positive real solutions correspond to invariant Einstein metrics.

Moreover, if $\frak{g}=\frak{k}\oplus\frak{m}$ is a reductive decomposition for $G/K$, and we assume that tangent space $\frak{m}=T_{o}G/K$ decomposes into $q$ pairwise inequivalent isotropy summands (i.e., irreducible $Ad(K)$-submodules)

$ \frak{m}= \frak{m}_1 + \frak{m}_2 + ..... + \frak{m}_q, $

then any $G$-invariant Riemannian metric is given by

$ g = < , > = x_1\cdot (-B)|_{\frak{m}_1}+\cdots+x_s\cdot (-B)|_{\frak{m}_q} $

for some positive real numbers $x_1, x_2, ... x_q$. Here $-B$ is the negative of the Killing form. (the induced inner product on the tangent space).

Homogeneous Einstein metrics are real soulutions of the system $\{r_1-r_2=0, ...., r_{q-1}-r_{q}=0\}$ where $r_{i}$ are the components of the invariant Ricci tensor on any isotropy summand. given by

\begin{equation}\label{ricc} r_{k}=\frac{1}{2x_{k}}+\frac{1}{4d_{k}}\sum_{i, j}\frac{x_{k}}{x_{i}x_{j}}[ijk]-\frac{1}{2d_{k}}\sum_{i, j}\frac{x_{j}}{x_{k}x_{i}}[kij], \qquad (k=1, \ldots, q). \end{equation} Here $[ijk]$ are the structure constants of $G/K$. Their computation is usually non-trivial. For particular classes of homogeneous spaces (e.g. isotropy irreducible), they are related with the Casimir operator of $\frak{g}$. They are non-zero only for these triples $\frak{m}_i$, $\frak{m}_j$, $\frak{m}_k$, for which

$B([\frak{m}_i, \frak{m}_j], \frak{m}_k)\neq 0$.

Positive real solutions of the above system may exist or not. Therefore, there are homogeneous spaces with no invariant Einstein metrics. For example, Wang and Ziller, by applying the variational approach of homogeneous Einstein metrics on compact homogeneous spaces, they proved that the 12-dimensional space $SU(4)/SU(2)$ does not admit any homogeneous Einstein metric.

see: M. Wang and W. Ziller: Existence and non-excistence of homogeneous Einstein metrics}, Invent.~Math.~84 (1986) 177--194.

This space seems to be the lowest dimensional example of a compact homogeneous manifold with no invariant Einstein metrics. In particular, from a recent work of B\"ohm and Kerr we know that :

Theorem: Any simply connected compact homogeneous Einstein manifod admts at least an invariant Einstein metric.

B\"ohm and M. Kerr: Low-dimensional homogeneous Einstein manifolds, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 358 (4) (2005) 1455--1468.

Other interesting examples of compact homogeneosu spaces with no invariant Einstein metrics were given in the latter article, but also in a work of Sakane and Park:

J-S. Park and Y. Sakane: Invariant Einstein metrics on certain homogeneous spaces, Tokyo J. Math. 20 (1) (1997) 51--61.

More general arguments about the existence of homogeneous EInstein metrics (which are based on the topology of compact homogeneous spaces and applications of variational analysis), are presented in the articles:

1) C. B\"ohm, M. Wang and W. Ziller: A variational approach for homogeneous Einstein metrics}, Geom. Funct. Anal. 14 (2004) (4) 681-733.

2) C. LeBrun and M. Wang (editors): Surveys in Differential Geometry} Volume VI Essays on Einstein Manifolds, International Press, 1999.

3) C. B\"ohm: Homogeneous Einstein metrics and simplicial complexes, J. Diff. Geom. 67 (2004) 79-165.

We mention that for the problem of non-homogeneous Einstein metrics on homogeneous spaces, less are knwon (see the work of Page, or Bohm for the existence of non homogeneous Einstein metrics.)

For non compact homogeneous manifolds (solvmanifolds, nilmanifolds, etc) we refer the reader to Heber's work and the refernces therin, although a lot of progress has been made in the last decade in this case too (see the works of Laurent, Tamaru, amd others).

J. Heber: Noncompact homogeneous Einstein space, Invent.~ Math.~133 (1998) 279-352.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.