MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Fix a prime $p\geqslant 5$ and weight $k\leqslant p+1$, and let $f\in S_k(N,\overline{\mathbb{Q}})$ be an eigenform.

Due to the congruence $E_{p-1} \equiv 1 \mod p$, we know that $\overline{E_{p-1}f}\in S_{k+p-1}(N,\overline{\mathbb{F_p}})$ is congruent to $f$ mod $p$, and it is a result (of Deligne-Serre?) that $E_{p-1}$ can be lifted to an eigenform in $S_{k+p-1}(N,\overline{\mathbb{Q}})$.

If $f$ is defined over $\mathbb{Z}$, from some limited calculations I've done it seems to be that there are two such lifts if $f$ is $p$-non-ordinary, and there is almost always only one if $f$ is $p$-ordinary. Does anyone know if this is true in general? It seems to have a bit of a "theta-cycles" flavour to it, although I'm not sure if you can use that theory to get this kind of "characteristic-zero information"?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 9 down vote accepted

It's deeper than theta cycles, I think.

I am going to assume that $N$ is prime to $p$ -- you don't say this in your question but most of my answer assumes this in a very serious way.

If $f$ is ordinary then the space of oldforms attached to $f$ at level $Np$ has dimension 2 and contains one ordinary and one non-ordinary form. Hida theory tells you that if there are no forms congruent to $f$ in weight $k$ and level $Np$ then the space of forms of weight $k+(p-1)$ and level $Np$ will also then contain one ordinary form congruent to $f$ (and only one). This form must be $p$-old, because newforms have big slope at big weight, and there's your explanation for the one form.

The non-ordinary case is deeper. Results of Fontaine/Edixhoven (see Edixhoven's Inventiones article on the weights in Serre's conjectures) tell you that the Galois representation attached to $f$ is irreducible even when restricted to a decomposition group at $p$ and furthermore on inertia it's $\omega_2^{k-1}$ plus its conjugate, with $\omega_2$ a niveau 2 character (see Serre's paper on Serre's conjecture, Duke 1987). The eigenform produced by "Deligne-Serre" (really just the going down theorem for finite flat $\mathbf{Z}_p$-algebras) has to have some slope. But the $p$-adic Langlands program is now sufficiently developed for $GL(2,\mathbf{Q}_p)$ that we can say a lot about this slope. Indeed, a theorem of Breuil [a convenient reference for this is Berger's recent Seminaire Bourbaki talk: Theoreme 5.2.1 part 3] shows that if $k>2$ then the slope of the weight $k+p-1$ form is forced to be strictly between 0 and 1. But this means that the slope is not an integer and hence the Deligne-Serre form has at least one other Galois conjugate and often precisely one by the general principle that if you only look at a few examples, then things will probably only be as complicated as they have to be. The Galois conjugate will give rise to a mod $p$ representation isomorphic to a conjugate of the mod $p$ representation attached to $f$, but your assumption about the coefficient field being the rationals mean that the mod $p$ representation attached to $f$ is defined over $GL(2,\mathbf{F}_p)$ and hence hitting with Galois doesn't move anything. Hence one is forced to get at least two, and probably in many cases exactly two, non-ordinary forms giving rise to the Galois representation in weight $k+p-1$.

share|cite|improve this answer
ah, cheers for that, that makes things a lot clearer. – Max Flander Jun 21 '11 at 0:49

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.