MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top
Come to think of it, "good" is subjective. What are your backgrounds and what are you looking for in one such survey? (In particular, why not read the original papers?) – Willie Wong Jun 16 '11 at 16:04
"good" = "one which you would recommend to a friend" – ε-δ Jun 20 '11 at 13:53

H. Bray's articles "Black Holes, Geometric Flows, and the Penrose Inequality in General Relativity" (Notices AMS, 2002) contains a very short, but elegant, survey of the positive mass theorem. He also has a longer survey that goes into several simpler cases.

share|cite|improve this answer
This survey says only who-did-and-what but it does not discuss the ideas in the proof. It also does not mention many related results. – ε-δ Jun 20 '11 at 13:52

Maybe Markus Khuri's RTG notes would help?

There's also a set of lecture notes by Rick Schoen for his 2009 course in Stanford on General Relativity, which has a nice discussion of the fundamental ideas involved in the proof of the PMT. I don't know if it is publich available on the internet though...

share|cite|improve this answer

Lecture notes (2009) by Rick Schoen on Relativity :

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.