MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

On pp 46 of his Eisenstein Ideal paper, Mazur states Theorem I.4 and in the discussion that follows, he mentions 'a standard patching argument' that completes the proof. I was wondering whether this is the same as the gluing lemma that's described in Hartshorne, or is Mazur referring to something else? I'd appreciate if someone can fill me in on the details or perhaps direct me to some reference.

share|cite|improve this question
5  
In general this is fpqc descent, for a cover you should write down. In this particular case one can also appeal to a simpler criterion, such as the one given by B. Bhatt here: www-personal.umich.edu/~bhattb/math/formalglueing.pdf – user1594 Jun 15 '11 at 15:53
    
Thanks for the link. – Saikat Biswas Jun 17 '11 at 15:21

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.