Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The DGA

For $k$ some field, let $R$ be a $k$-algebra, and let $r\in R$.

Define a differential graded algebra $\mathbf{R}_r$ as follows. As a graded algebra, it is isomorphic to $R\langle t\rangle$, the free $k$-algebra over $R$ with non-central variable $t$ added. The algebra $R$ has degree zero, and $t$ has degree one. The differential $d$ is defined by $d(R)=0$ and $d(t)=r$, and extend by the Leibniz rule.

As a chain complex, the DGA $\mathbf{R}_r$ then looks like $$ R\leftarrow RtR\leftarrow RtRtR \leftarrow ...$$ Note that each $t$ may be replaced by $\otimes_k$ without changing the $R$-bimodule structure. So what are the homology groups? Clearly, $d(RtR)=RrR\subset R$, and so $H_0(\mathbf{R}_r)=R/r$ (the quotient by the two-sided ideal generated by $r$).

The Question

My question is, for what $R$ and $r$ do all higher homology groups of $\mathbf{R}_r$ vanish? Equivalently, when is $\mathbf{R}_r$ quasi-isomorphic to $R/r$?

Examples and Counterexamples

There are some immediate answers. When $r=1$, the complex $\mathbf{R}_1$ is the (augmented) bar resolution of $R$ as a bimodule over itself. As the name implies, the homology groups vanish. The standard argument for the exactness of the bar resolution (constructing a chain homotopy between the identity map and the zero map on $\mathbf{R}_1$) can be generalized to $\mathbf{R}_r$ for any $r$ which is a central unit.

If $R=k[x]$ and $r=x$, then a direct computation shows that the higher homology groups vanish, and so $\mathbf{R}_x$ is a resolution of $R/x\simeq k$.

As a counterexample, consider $R=k[x]$, and $r=x^2$. For $xt-tx\in (\mathbf{R}_{x^2})_1$, we have $$ d(xt-tx)=x(x^2)-(x^2)x=0$$ However, any 1-boundary $d(atbtc)$ must have $x$-degree at least 2, and so $xt-tx$ is not exact.

share|improve this question
2  
I don't have an answer for your question. If R is a free algebra with r mapping to one of the generators, then the higher homology groups all vanish (this is because R is the free DGA on a chain complex weakly equivalent to a complex in degree zero obtained by forgetting the generators). I'm pretty sure that this means you're computing the derived pushout of $k\leftarrow k[x]\to R$ in associative DGAs, where $x\mapsto r$. This, to me, suggests that the higher homology groups may be simply "what they are". (Also, if r is any unit, $H_n$ is an $H_0=0$-module and so is zero.) –  Tyler Lawson Jun 14 '11 at 1:55
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 6 down vote accepted

This complex (in simultaneously a more general setting, where you have several elements $t_1,\ldots,t_p$, and a more special setting, because only the case of $R$ being a free algebra was studied then) was introduced by Shafarevich [E. S. Golod, I. R. Shafarevich, “On the class field tower”, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat., 28:2 (1964), 261–272], and was studied somewhat thoroughly recently, see, e.g. [E. S. Golod, “Homology of the Shafarevich complex and noncommutative complete intersections”, Fundam. Prikl. Mat., 5:1 (1999), 85–95] - this paper again dealing with the case of free $R$. As the latter paper suggests, this complex is a noncommutative generalisation of the Koszul complex in the commutative case, detecting the "noncommutative complete intersections" usually known as "strongly free sets" from a paper of Anick [D. J. Anick, Non-commutative graded algebras and their Hilbert series, J. Algebra, Volume 78, Issue 1, September 1982, Pages 120-140].

Finally, in the case of arbitrary (graded) $R$ this complex is discussed in a paper of Piontkovski [http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0606279] for the purpose of studying "relative noncommutative complete intersections". You would be especially interested in "Theorem-Definition 2.3" from that paper.

(For those who cannot be bothered to check the references, one condition of Piontkovski's paper is completely analogous to the complete intersection result stating that $A=B[f_1,\ldots,f_k]$ for a regular sequence $f_1,\ldots,f_k$: the complex in question is acyclic iff $R=(R/r)\langle r\rangle$. Here one has to make some assumptions, e.g. assume $R$ graded and $r$ being homogeneous of positive degree, so this does not cover central units mentioned in the question, whereas Tyler Lawson's example is the simplest instance of this result.)

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you Vladimir, this was the kind of survey answer I was looking for. –  Greg Muller Jun 14 '11 at 16:33
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.