Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $S, S_1$ be subsets of the positive numbers $\mathbb{N}$. We say (as usual) that $S$ is multiplicative closed if $x \in S$ and $y \in S$ implies $xy \in S.$ We say also that $S_1$ is arithmetic closed if $x \in S_1$ and $y \in S_1,$ and $\gcd(x,y)=1,$ implies $xy \in S_1.$

Let $T$ be a subset of the positive integers containing $1$ and at least another element. The smallest multiplicative closed set that contains $T$ (say $C(T)$ ) i.e., the intersection of all multiplicative closed sets that contain $T,$ is also equal to the set containing $1$ and containing all finite products of powers of primes $p^{a_p}$ (say), where $p$ is prime and $a_p >0$ is minimal with the property $p^{a_p} \in T.$

Question: How to describe (analogously ?) the smallest arithmetic closed set that contains $T$ (say $A(T)$ ) i.e., the intersection of all arithmetic closed sets that contain $T.$

Example: If $T$ contains exactly $1$ and all $3 \cdot 2^n$ with $n>0$ then $C(T)$ is the set of $1$ and all products $2^a \cdot 3^b$ with $a >0$ and $b > 0,$ while

$$ A(T) = T. $$

share|improve this question
    
So any random set of 1 and assorted multiples of 6,10, and 15 is a.c. I don't see your claim about m.c. As your example shows, there need not be any prime powers in such a set. –  Aaron Meyerowitz Jun 12 '11 at 23:54
    
C(T) finite implies T=C(T) and has only the number 1 in it. For any finite subset U of T, A(U) is finite. If you map each integer t to its squarefree part u, A(U) will be a subsemilattice resembling a subsemilattice of finite subsets of primes which divide some member of T, under the operation of union. I doubt you will get a cleaner description which is number-theoretic in character. Gerhard "Ask Me About System Design" Paseman, 2011.06.12 –  Gerhard Paseman Jun 13 '11 at 4:03
    
This question doesn't seem to be appropriate for MathOverflow, since it is about basic undergraduate number theory. I'm inclined to close it. –  S. Carnahan Jun 13 '11 at 8:13
    
It may be possible to rescue it by generalizing to near-rings, or tying it to other current research somehow. I have seen better questions from Luis Gallardo. If he does not provide sufficient motivation and correction, I would support closing. Gerhard "Ask Me About System Design" Paseman, 2011.06.13 –  Gerhard Paseman Jun 13 '11 at 8:26
    
Good idea to close. Thanks for comments anyway. –  Luis H Gallardo Jun 13 '11 at 10:06

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

It does not matter much if one includes 1 or not. In the case that $T$ is finite and the members are square free you have the question: Given a family $T$ of subsets of a finite set $U$, what can we say about the smallest subset of the power-set $2^U$ which is closed under disjoint unions? I'm not sure how much there is to say. When $T$ is finite, also $A(T)$ is finite and a subset of the set of divisors of the least common multiple of the members of $T$. For $T$ infinite not so much changes.

For fixed $k \gt 1,$ we have $ A(\lbrace t^k \mid t \in T \rbrace)=\lbrace a^k \mid a \in A(T) \rbrace$ but $A(kT)=kT.$

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.