Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

For a product of otherwise identical systems evolving at different rates, the toplogical entropy and a quantity very closely related to (indeed, identifiable with a nondegenerate variant of) the $L^2$ mixing rate behave quite similarly.

Specifically, the topological entropy of such a flow satisfies

$h(\prod_m \phi_{c_m t}) = \sum_m c_m \cdot h(\phi_t)$,

where we assume $c_m > 0$. Meanwhile, if $f$ is a function extremizing the Rayleigh quotient $\mathcal{E}(f)/Var(f)$ associated to a Markov generator $Q$ (here $\mathcal{E}$ is the Dirichlet form and the implied measure is obtained from $Q$) and we consider the tensor sum $Q^\otimes := \sum_m I^{\otimes(m-1)} \otimes c_m Q \otimes I^{\otimes(N-m)}$, the corresponding quotient

$\mathcal{E}^\otimes(f^{\otimes N})/Var(f^{\otimes N}) = \sum_m c_m \cdot \mathcal{E}(f)/Var(f)$

is also an extremum (but not a global one, as that corresponds to ignoring all the factors save the one with the least $c_m$). Ignoring degenerate extrema leads to the variant of the $L^2$ mixing rate alluded to above (and recovers the usual mixing rate for non-product systems).

Now in some sense the above is a glorified scaling argument, and not much more. But on the other hand the two concepts provide probably the most natural rates in their respective domains of applicability--except when they overlap, in which case it would be nice to know if their similar scaling behavior is more than a coincidence.

So: is there a concrete sense in which topological entropy and $L^2$ mixing rates have or can be related?

I am aware of work by Fernandes et al involving conductances, but could only scrounge up one reference which doesn't seem particularly helpful (though I plan to look at it more closely, it is confusing at first glance). Similarly, I am also aware of the recent paper by Richeson and Wiseman which touches on chain recurrence rates. But I am hoping for something more specifically geared to $L^2$ versus some kind of symbolic or topological mixing rate, or on the other hand a more universal point of view encompassing most or all notions of mixing rate.

share|improve this question
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.