Welcome to MathOverflow

Question

4

1

I have a 4n$\times$4n matrix, which can be written as \begin{pmatrix} 0 & A &B &C \cr D& 0& E & F \cr G& H & 0 & J \cr K& L& M& 0 \end{pmatrix}

each entry being an n$\times$n matrix with vanishing determinant. Is there a rule for checking if the full matrix has zero determinant? How about the special case \begin{pmatrix} 0 & A &B &C \cr -A^T & 0& E & F \cr -B^T & E^T & 0 & J \cr -C^T & F^T & J^T & 0 \end{pmatrix}

still with vanishing determinants for each n$\times$n matrix?

(The n is the dimension of an SU group -- I can probably work out the SU(2) or n=3 case by brute force, but I would like to know if there is some method that does not require explicit calculation.)

Many thanks in advance for any help or suggestion.

edited Jun 8 2011 at 17:44

asked Jun 8 2011 at 15:29

Amitabha Lahiri
61●3

1

In your special case, do you want minus signs on $E^T$, $F^T$ and $J^T$ as well? – Neil Strickland Jun 8 2011 at 17:04

No, actually E,F,J are antisymmetric, so $E^T = -E$ etc (for n=3, which makes the determinant vanish). A,B,C are not antisymmetric, they only have vanishing determinants (one row vanishes). For higher n I am not absolutely certain what I will get in the special case. – Amitabha Lahiri Jun 8 2011 at 17:28

1

Just out of curiousity, is there any motivation behind this question? I am not being negative, really just curious. – Vladimir Dotsenko Jun 8 2011 at 17:30

Yes, I found this problem while trying to count the degrees of freedom in a particular system. – Amitabha Lahiri Jun 8 2011 at 17:41

If the matrices commuted (perhaps most of the pairs instead of all of them), then you could reduce the problem to the determinant of a nxn matrix product. Or if e.g. A B and C were simultaneously diagonalizable, you could then check if say the first n rows had full rank. Apart from that, I can only suggest the standard methods without shortcuts. Gerhard "Ask Me About System Design" Paseman, 2011.06.08 – Gerhard Paseman Jun 8 2011 at 17:58

show 1 more comment

Stopple · Answer 1 · 2011-06-08 18:34:37Z UTC

It would be nice if the rule for determinants for $2\times2$ matrices generalized to the case of $2n\times 2n$ matrices:

$\det \begin{pmatrix} A & B \cr C & D \end{pmatrix} =\det A \det D - \det B\det C$,

but this is sadly not true.

Nonetheless, the familiar Laplace expansion theorem for minors of order $n-1$ does have a generalization to minors of any order, including, in this case, minors of order $2n$ of a $4n \times 4n$ matrix, see http://www.proofwiki.org/wiki/Laplace's_Expansion_Theorem

This might help.

Determinant of block matrix

Remember to vote up questions/answers you find interesting or helpful (requires 15 reputation points)

1 Answer

You can accept an answer to one of your own questions by clicking the check mark next to it. This awards 15 reputation points to the person who answered and 2 reputation points to you.