Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I want to learn the book, but it seems that I should have some background on harmonic analysis, Lie Groups and measure theory. Can you give some references?

share|improve this question
4  
I think you have the wrong title for the book. –  Felipe Voloch Jun 6 '11 at 11:17
    
(edited title ) –  Qfwfq Jun 6 '11 at 11:31
4  
I am having trouble remembering where harmonic analysis or measure theory comes up in Mumford's Abelian Varieties, even implicitly. How did you determine that these were prerequisites? –  Pete L. Clark Jun 6 '11 at 11:53
1  
As suggested by Charles Matthews's answer below, once you get past the analytic theory of the first chapter, the main prerequisites are a solid understanding of EGA style algebraic geometry (such as you might learn from Hartshorne Chapters II and III). It doesn't seem that realistic to me to read these later chapters without that background. The first chapter is different; for this some analytic background is necessary. Perhaps that is what you want to read, given your analytically oriented take on the prerequisites? –  Emerton Jun 6 '11 at 13:02
2  
i encourage all young people to simply open these great books and start reading. prerequisites be damned. i have personally benefited from this book and don't know much about the prerequisites you list. –  roy smith Jun 15 '11 at 6:42

1 Answer 1

up vote 5 down vote accepted

To discuss generally first, the book was written up by C. P. Ramanujam, and he was more conscientious than usual in trying to tie down Mumford's lectures to existing references. Still, it is quite hard to sort out the exact prerequisites.

The analytic theory and theta-functions required in the first chapter stands rather aside from the rest, which is mostly in the EGA/SGA vein. You do need some Fourier theory for Chapter I; the style given is a bit Bourbaki-oriented, I recall, but there are alternatives (for example, take certain things for granted, and/or read another text on the analytic theory).

As for the rest, I remember finding the homological algebra prerequisites steep. Hartshorne's text will take you some way; but the spectral sequences and mapping cylinders rather expect expertise. Since the "Great American Sheaf Theory Book" isn't yet written, I'm not quite sure what to recommend. Probably a more modern treatment of the duality theory post-Mukai would be good to look at anyway, rather than obsessing over each of Mumford's proofs.

share|improve this answer
    
"Since the "Great American Sheaf Theory Book" isn't yet written..." Very well put, Charles, and a regrettable lack, too. I am sure many here would share my gratitude if some MathOverflower(s) closed that gap in the literature. –  Georges Elencwajg Jun 6 '11 at 19:56

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.