Sign up ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Dear all,

I would like to know whether the following claim is true. In particular, if it is true, then I would like to know if there is some textbook that contains the statement and maybe even the proof:

$\forall n \in \mathbb{N}, \ \exists k_n > 0$ such that

for any real numbers $A_1, \ldots, A_n, \varphi_1, \ldots, \varphi_n$ and any distinct positive numbers $\lambda_1, \ldots, \lambda_n$,

$\sup_{t \in \mathbb{R}} \left| \sum_{i=1}^n A_i \cos(\lambda_i t + \varphi_i) \right| \geq k_n \max(|A_1|, \ldots, |A_n|)$.

I think I have a (quite complicated) proof for $n \leq 3$, but I would like to know whether the statement holds in general.

Many thanks indeed,

share|cite|improve this question
Thank you for the replies that I have received so far. Just to clarify: k_n MUST ONLY DEPEND ON n. Anyone know? Many thanks, Julian. –  Julian Newman Jun 3 '11 at 15:02
You probably want the $\lambda_i$ distinct modulo $2\pi$. –  Juris Steprans Jun 3 '11 at 15:17
@Juris: What difference does it make? The inequality is invariant under scaling of all the $\lambda_i$’s by a nonzero constant. –  Emil Jeřábek Jun 3 '11 at 16:06

1 Answer 1

up vote 5 down vote accepted

Yes, this is true. It follows from the fact that the average $$\lim_{T\to\infty} {1\over T}\int_0^T\cos(\lambda_i t+\phi_i)\sum_j A_j\cos(\lambda_j t+\phi_j)\,dt$$ is $A_i/2$. Clearly the average is bounded by the supremum of the function.

share|cite|improve this answer
Many thanks for the answer. I presume the first two subscript i are meant to be a fixed number, and the second two are meant to be what you sum over. –  Julian Newman Jun 3 '11 at 16:11
I have edited it accordingly. –  Michael Renardy Jun 3 '11 at 17:11

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.