MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm seeking a reference for the following fact.

The cone of positive semidefinite matrices is self-dual (a.k.a. self-polar).

This result is relatively easy to prove, has been known for a long time, and is fundamental to things like semidefinite programming. Ideally, I would like a reference that reflects all three of those properties. Unfortunately, the properties themselves make it hard to find a good reference to cite. (Many sources I've looked at consider this result elementary and well-known enough to simply state without proof or reference. That was sort of my plan as well, but a referee is now asking for a reference, and seeing as how our paper is outside of optimization theory, I think that's probably reasonable.)

By the way, this result is occasionally referred to as Fejer's Trace Theorem, although I have never encountered an actual reference to any publication of Fejer. So if anyone knows the source of this attribution, that would be interesting.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

share|cite|improve this question

I am pretty sure Boyd's convex optimization (available on his web page as a pdf) talks about this (yes: example 2.24)

share|cite|improve this answer
Great! I don't know if this is the ideal reference I'm after, but it certainly looks better than any I knew of before. – Louis Deaett Jun 9 '11 at 19:23

Perhaps the Notes section of the classic book: Analysis on symmetric cones is of help.

In particular, they mention that the following paper of Koecher started the study of symmetric cones. I have not yet read this paper, so cannot say if it was this paper that described the self-duality result that you mention. But I hope the Notes section mentioned above does provide some clues.

M. Koecher (1957). Positivitätsbereiche in $R^n$. Amer J. Math., 79.

share|cite|improve this answer
I'm in the process of trying to get ahold of this book. It sounds promising. – Louis Deaett Jun 9 '11 at 19:34

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.