Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is there a known example of a countable discrete group G whose full group C*-algebra C*(G) is not quasidiagonal?

Let us recall that a separable C*-algebra A is quasidiagonal if it admits a faithful *-representation $\pi:A \to L(H)$ on a separable Hilbert space with the property that there is an increasing sequence $(p_n)$ of finite rank projections in $L(H)$ which converges strongly to $1_H$ and such that for each $a\in A$, $\lim_{n\to \infty}\|[\pi(a)p_n-p_n\pi(a)]\|=0$.

$G=SL_3(\mathbb{Z})$ is believed to be a candidate. Bekka has shown that $C^*(SL_3(\mathbb{Z}))$ is not residually finite dimensional.

share|improve this question
    
Gromov's random group containing expander? –  Mark Sapir May 26 '11 at 22:16
2  
Presumably, if someone knew the answer to this, they would have written it up and publicized it... –  Yemon Choi May 26 '11 at 23:15

2 Answers 2

up vote 3 down vote accepted

I don't know much about the subject, but isn't this an example? There is a discrete property (T) group $G$ without nontrivial finite dimensional representations [2, Remark in the last page]. Then, its max C*-algebra contains a non-QD algebra as its direct summand, namely $C^*(G)(1-z)$ for the Kazhdan projection $z$ (corresponding to the trivial rep) [1, Corollary 17.2.6].

[1] N. P. Brown and N. Ozawa. -algebras and finite-dimensional approximations, volume 88 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2008.

[2] P. de la Harpe, A. G. Robertson, and A. Valette. On the spectrum of the sum of generators for a finitely generated group. Israel J. Math., 81(1-2):65–96, 1993.

share|improve this answer
    
I don't see why general QD $C^*$-algebras need to have finite dimensional quotients, in general; my (limited) understanding of Andreas Thom's answer is that he and Ozawa have shown that certain group $C^*$-algebras are special in this regard –  Yemon Choi Jun 13 '11 at 18:07
    
Unital QD algebras must have amenable traces. The combination of the property (T) and an amenable trace implies the existence of a fin. dim representation [Brown-Ozawa, Cor. 6.4.10]. –  Makoto Yamashita Jun 13 '11 at 22:14

Over the last week, I was discussing this question with Narutaka Ozawa. I could come up with a proof that quasi-diagonal, torsion generated Kazhdan groups must have a finite quotient. Here, a group is called quasi-diagonal, if it admits a faithful quasi-diagonal unitary representation. In particular, some Tarski monsters (as constructed by Ol'shanskii) cannot have a quasi-diagonal maximal group $C^{\ast}$-algebra.

Meanwhile, we could generalize this result and prove:

Theorem: Every infinite quasi-diagonal Kazhdan group has an infinite residually finite quotient.

The proof is a bit involved, but it is easy to prove a weaker result in a special case. Assume that $G$ has a quasi-diagonal unitary representation $\pi \colon G \to U(H)$ without fixed vectors, and show that there is at least one non-trivial finite quotient. Let $p_n$ be a sequence of finite rank projections, such that $\|[\pi(g),p_n]\|\to 0$.

Now, for a finite rank operator $T$, $$\|T\|_{HS} \leq {\rm rk}(T)^{1/2} \cdot \|T\|,$$ where $\|.\|_{HS}$ denotes the Hilbert-Schmidt norm. This easily implies that $p_n \cdot {\rm rk}(p_n)^{-1/2}$ is a sequence of unit vectors in $HS(H)$ (the Hilbert space of Hilbert-Schmidt operators) which is more and more invariant under the conjugation action. Hence, since $G$ is a Kazhdan group, there must exist a conjugation invariant Hilbert-Schmidt operator $T$. Since the eigenspaces of $T^*T$ are finite-dimensional and $G$-invariant, $G$ admits a non-trivial finite-dimensional representation. By Malcev's theorem, every finitely generated subgroup of $U(n)$ is residually finite, so that $G$ also admits at least one non-trivial finite quotient.

The remaining work involves showing that one can assume that $\pi$ has no fixed vectors and that there exist many finite quotients. We will upload the complete argument to the arXiv within the next weeks.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.