Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

As we know, the big galois group $Gal(\overline{\mathbb{Q}}/\mathbb{Q})$ acts on the $l$-power torsion points of an elliptic curve over Q for some prime $l$, and defines a representation in a natural way. My question is, if we consider the product of such representations for all elliptic curves defined over Q, can we get an faithful one?

share|improve this question
1  
First of all, what do you mean with the product of infinitely many representations? (you are considering all elliptic curves up to isogeny, and you want to get a continuous representation I guess). Besides the continuity issue, you can ask the following question: if we add to Q the $l^n$ torion of all elliptic curves over Q, do we get $\bar{Q}$? The answer should be no, since away from $2,3$ and $l$, the ramification of the field obtained with each elliptic curve is "small", which is not true in $\bar{Q}$. –  A. Pacetti May 26 '11 at 16:02

1 Answer 1

up vote 7 down vote accepted

No, this isn't possible : it would imply that $\operatorname{Gal}(\overline{\mathbf{Q}}/\mathbf{Q})$ injects into the group $\mathrm{GL}_2(\mathbf{Z}_{\ell})^{\mathbf{N}}$. But $\operatorname{Gal}(\overline{\mathbf{Q}}/\mathbf{Q})$ contains pro-$p$-groups for $p \neq \ell$, while $\mathrm{GL}_2(\mathbf{Z}_{\ell})^{\mathbf{N}}$ does not.

share|improve this answer
    
what if we consider the product of the $l$-adic representations for all primes $l$ and all elliptic curves over $Q$? –  gummi May 26 '11 at 16:00
1  
@gummi : My impression is that the absolute Galois group is too complicated an object to be contained in a group like $\operatorname{GL}_2(\widehat{\mathbf{Z}})^{\mathbf{N}}$, but I don't have an argument right now. –  François Brunault May 26 '11 at 16:14
    
@gummi: the result of Serre that the image of Galois on the Tate module of abelian varieties is as large as possible (if the dimension $g$ is odd, then the image is open in $Sp_{2g}(Z_l)$) suggests that the answer is negative. –  SGP May 26 '11 at 16:43
4  
@gummi: there is a number field, Galois over the rationals, with $Gal(M/Q)$ isomorphic to the monster group. Why not try and prove that this group cannot possibly show up in any number field obtained by adjoining $n$-torsion points of elliptic curves over the rationals. –  Kevin Buzzard May 27 '11 at 8:05

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.