MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I seem to recall once hearing a result to the effect that $\emptyset^{(\omega)}$ was the double jump of some other degree, but could not be the triple jump of any degree. However I'm unable to find the exact result. Does anyone know what I might be thinking of (or what is actually known about jump inversion on $\emptyset^{(\omega)}$, if I'm remembering this completely wrong)?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 7 down vote accepted

This doesn't exactly answer your question but...

If $A$ is any upper bound for the arithmetic degrees then $0^{(\omega)}$ is recursive in $A^{\prime\prime}$. Enderton and Putnam proved that there upper bounds with $A^{\prime\prime}=0^{(\omega)} $


share|cite|improve this answer
But this does answer my question: the question was what result I was thinking of, and I'm fairly sure this was the result. – Henry Towsner May 16 '11 at 2:32

As far as actual jump inversion goes, any degree $X \geq 0^{(n)}$ is the $n$th jump of some other degree. An easy way to see this is to apply Friedberg jump inversion relative to $0^{(n-1)}$, then relative to $0^{(n-2)}$, and so on down to $0$. The theorem is also true through transfinite iterates of the jump: if $X \geq 0^{(\alpha)}$, then $X$ is the $\alpha$th jump of some degree. The general version of this theorem for any $\alpha$-REA operator is due to Jockusch and Shore (1984).

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.