Let G be simple algebraic group, P its parabolic subgroup. Then the category of G-equivariant vector bundles on G/P is equivalent to the category of representations of P. Borel-Weil-Bott tells us how to compute cohomology of the bundles corresponding to irreducible representations of P, and so also of the bundles corresponding to completely reducible representations of P. But some important G-equivariant bundles on G/P are not completely reducible, for example the tangent bundle of $\operatorname{SO}(2n+1)/P_i$, where $P_i$ is the i-th maximal parabolic subgroup of $\operatorname{SO}(2n+1)$. So my question is: is there a way to compute cohomology of such bundles? Maybe there exists some class of groups including parabolic subgroups of reductive groups and some class of representations of such groups which is larger than completely reducible representations but still manageable?
Remember to vote up questions/answers you find interesting or helpful (requires 15 reputation points)
|
3
1
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
I'm not aware of any generalization that is strong enough to compute the cohomology of such bundles completely, but you can at least use the Borel--Weil--Bott theorem to get some vanishing results. This was already done by Bott in his 1957 Annals paper to show that the cohomology of the tangent bundle $T$ of It remains to compute For the details, you can either try Bott's original paper, or checkout section 11 of this paper of Dennis Snow. Another paper of potential interest is
|
|||
|
|
You can accept an answer to one of your own questions by clicking the check mark next to it. This awards 15 reputation points to the person who answered and 2 reputation points to you.
|
0
|
I have dealt with this situation many times, and as far as I can tell, you just need to chase some long exact sequences (or spectral sequences if you want). There is a paper by Ottaviani and Rubei http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0403307 that translates the problem of calculating cohomology of a homogeneous bundle (when the base space is a Hermitian symmetric variety) into doing some calculations over some quiver with relations. I was never able to actually use this to get an answer, but it may be interesting for you. |
||
|
|

