Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Hello!

We know that we have an alternative way to define a complex structure on manifold, by means of an integrable almost complex structure. The two points of view are equivalent, this is the content of the Newlander-Nirenberg theorem (which is very difficult to prove).

I think that there is the same kind of notion for vector bundles (just replace the bundle map between the tangent bundle and itself by a bundle map from your vector bundle and itself). My question is:

Do we have also an equivalence theorem in the spirit of Newlander-Nirenberg for general vector bundles?

If somebody could give me some reference towards an article, it would be great.

Thank you!

share|improve this question
add comment

3 Answers

up vote 10 down vote accepted

I think I do not exactly understand the question. A complex vector bundle on a manifold is the same as a real vector bundle, together with an endomorphism $J$ with $J^2 =-1$. This is elementary linear algebra and does not deserve to be called an analog of Nirenberg-Newlander theorem.

A different question is whether one can characterize holomorphic bundles on complex manifolds in a similar fashion. If $V$ is a holomorphic vector bundle, then there is the Cauchy-Riemann (Dolbeault or Wirtinger) operator $\overline{D}:\Gamma (M;V) \to \mathcal{A}^{0,1}(M,V)$ and it satisfies $\overline{D} (fs) = (\overline{\partial}f)s +f \overline{D}s$ for each function $f$ and each section $s$ (I wrote $D$ to distinguish it from the operator on functions). Clearly, $\overline{D}$ encodes the holomorphic structure (holomorphic sections are solutions of $Ds=0$). It is a reasonable question whether for any such operator $D$ on $V$, there exists a holomorphic structure whose Cauchy-Riemann operator is $D$. This amounts, for each $x \in M$, to the existence of local solutions that form a basis at $x$. At least in complex dimension $1$, the answer is ''yes''; see Atiyah, Bott: ''The Yang-Mills equation on Riemann surfaces'', p.555. They give a reference to a different proof, which might well generalize to higher dimensions.

share|improve this answer
    
@Johannes Ebert: Thank you very much for your answer, this is exactly what I needed, and I am sorry for the confusion. Thank you again! –  Benjamin May 13 '11 at 11:19
add comment

Let me supplement Johannes' answer a bit. In higher dimensions a holomorphic vector bundle $V$ is equivalent to a $C^\infty$ bundle equipped with a Cauchy-Riemann operator $\bar D$ (as explained in his answer) which is integrable in the sense that $(\bar D)^2=0$. In one direction, this is easy. For the converse see theorem 2.1.53 in the book by Donaldson and Kronheimer.

share|improve this answer
    
And to further supplement Johannes' answer: In dimension 1 we automatically have $\overline{D}^2 = 0$ because $\mathcal{A}^{0,2} = 0$. –  Kevin H. Lin May 14 '11 at 0:39
add comment

Another great reference is S.Kobayashi, "Differential Geometry of Complex Vector Bundles", Chapter I, Proposition 3.7.

share|improve this answer
    
@dalakov: Thank you very much! –  Benjamin May 13 '11 at 14:55
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.