Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $X$ be a hyperelliptic curve and let $i:X\to X$ denote the hyperelliptic involution. Once we fix a point $x_0\in X$ we get the Abel-Jacobi map $AJ:X\to J$ where $J$ denotes the Jacobian variety. Now the Jacobian is also equipped with an involution, namely $x\mapsto x^{-1}$. Is it possible to choose the base point $x_0$ in such a way that the restriction of the involution on the Jacobian is the involution on $X$.

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers 2

up vote 6 down vote accepted

Yes, pick $x_0$ to be a Weierstrass point, i.e. a fixed point of the hyperelliptic involution.

Let $\sigma$ denote the hyperelliptic involution on $X$. Under the Abel-Jacobi map we have $x \mapsto [x-x_0]$ and $\sigma(x) \mapsto [\sigma(x) - x_0]$. Now $[x + \sigma(x) - 2x_0]$ is the divisor of a function, since it is the pullback under the hyperelliptic map of a degree zero divisor on $\mathbf P^1$. Hence $AJ(x)$ and $AJ(\sigma(x))$ are inverses.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Another way to think of this is the following (at least over $\mathbb{C}$).

Consider the diagram $$ \begin{array}{ccccc} X & \xrightarrow{AJ \times AJ \circ \sigma} & J \times J & & \\\\ \downarrow & & \downarrow & & \\\\ \mathbb{P}^1 & \to & Sym^2J & \xrightarrow{+} & J \end{array}. $$ Note that the composition along the bottom row must be constant, as there are no non-trivial maps from $\mathbb{P}^1$ to any Abelian variety.

What this tells you is that $f(x) = AJ(x) + AJ\big(\sigma(x)\big)$ is constant. So if you translate it (i.e. choose a different basepoint): $$ \tilde{AJ}(x) = AJ(x) - \frac{f(x)}{2} $$ then you find that the corresponding $\tilde{f}(x) = 0$ for all $x$. That is, the two involutions agree with each other as desired.

share|improve this answer
There seems to be a small argument missing here, since not every translation on $\mathrm{Pic}^0$ comes from a different choice of basepoint. –  Dan Petersen May 13 '11 at 6:55
If $x_0$ is chosen to be a Weierstrass point then the image of $x_0$ (and hence all of $\mathbb{P}^1$) in $J$ is 0, so there is no need to translate. –  Jim Bryan May 13 '11 at 14:40
add comment

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.