Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Consider the complex $n$-by-$n$ matrices $M_n$. Suppose that $A_i$, for $i=1,\ldots,n^2$, satisfy $\mathrm{Tr}(A_i^* A_j)=\delta_{ij}$, so that together they form an orthonormal basis for $M_n$. Define a linear map $T \colon M_n \to M_n \otimes M_n$ by $T(A_i) = A_i \otimes A_i$.

Question: when is $T$ completely positive?

For example, if $A_i$ are the matrices with a single entry one and the rest zeroes in some fixed basis of $\mathbb{C}^n$, then $T$ is completely positive. In fact, I think these might be the only examples. If $T$ is completely positive, then the following are equivalent to $A_i$ being matrix units as in the above example:

  • each $A_i$ has rank one;
  • each positive semidefinite $A_i$ has trace one;
  • the set $\{0,A_1,\ldots,A_{n^2}\}$ is closed under multiplication;
  • $T(1)$ is idempotent;
  • $T^*(1) \leq 1$;
  • $T$ preserves trace.

These are sufficient conditions, but proving they are sufficient doesn't use $\mathrm{Tr}(A_i^* A_j)=\delta_{ij}$ at all. Are they necessary?

share|improve this question
    
do you assume $A_i\geq 0$? –  Kate Juschenko May 9 '11 at 17:55
    
We can't assume $A_i\geq 0$ because self-adjoint matrices can never span all of $M_n$ (unless $n=1$). A good example to understand the question with is the following: $A_i$ are the matrices with a single entry one and the rest zeroes in some fixed basis of $\mathbb{C}^n$. Notice that not all $A_i$ in this example are $\geq 0$, indeed, they need not even be self-adjoint. –  Chris Heunen May 9 '11 at 18:11
1  
the second condition confused me, now I see what you mean –  Kate Juschenko May 9 '11 at 18:26
1  
I'm confused. Why are these conditions equivalent? Shouldn't we be able to find sets of $A_i$ so there are no positive semidefinite $A_i$ (just take the negative of any $A_i$ which is positive semidefinite), so condition (ii) holds, but where none of the other conditions holds. –  Peter Shor May 10 '11 at 0:58
    
The text after the question proper was meant to be helpful extra information halfway to an answer, but I see how it could be confusing. I've edited it, hopefully it is clearer now. –  Chris Heunen May 10 '11 at 9:41
show 1 more comment

1 Answer

This is not a complete answer, but it might help.

The map $T: A_i \mapsto A_i \otimes A_i$ sends, by its very definition, the orthonormal family $(A_i)$ to an orthonormal family. It is therefore an isometry for the Hilbert-Schmidt norms.

But there are not that many completely positive maps $M_n \to M_m$ which are also isometries for the Hilbert-Schmidt-norms. Namely such a map is of the form $T(x)= D \pi(x)$, for some (not necessarily unital) $*$-homomorphism $\pi$ and some positive operator $D=T(1)\in M_m$ commuting with the range of $\pi$. This is an if-and-only-if condition provided that $\|D\|_{HS}=\sqrt n$. This statement is probably known. If you want I can expand the proof I have in mind.

This implies that such a map satisfies $Tr\circ T=c Tr$ for some positive $c=Tr(D)/n$, and more generally that for any $p>0$, $\|Tx\|_p = c_p \|x\|_p$ for $c_p=\|D\|_p/n^{1/p}$.

Coming back to your problem, I do not see how to conclude, you can already find a couple of necessary conditions on the $A_i$'s for the map $T(A_i)=A_i \otimes A_i$ to be completely positive.


Matthew asked for a proof of

A linear map $T:M_n\to M_m$ is completely positive and isometric for the Hilbert-Schmidt norm if and only if $T$ is of the form $T(x)= D \pi(x)$, for some (not necessarily unital) $*$-homomorphism $\pi$ and some positive operator $D=T(1)\in M_m$ commuting with the range of $\pi$, and such that $\|D\|_{HS}=\sqrt n$.

I only prove the "only if" direction. Assume that $T$ is cp and isometric for the Hilbert-Schmidt norm. Using the fact that $T$ is cp, by Stinespring's theorem, there is a (finite dimensional) Hilbert space $H$ and a linear map $V:\mathbb C^m \to H\otimes \mathbb C^n$ such that $T$ can be decomposed as $T(x)=V^* 1_H \otimes x V$. I claim that the assumption that $T$ is isometric implies that $VV^*$ is of the form $A \otimes 1_n$ for some positive $A \in B(H)$ (in particular $V V^*$ commutes with $1\otimes x$ for all $x \in M_n$). This will imply that $T(x) T(y) = T(1) T(xy) = T(xy) T(1)$ for all $x,y \in M_n$, and hence putting $\pi(x) = T(x) T(1)^{-1}$ (with the convention $0/0=0$) we get the proposition.

The claim is not complicated to check. By the trace property, $\langle Tx,Ty \rangle = Tr(VV^* (1\otimes x) V V^* (1\otimes y^* ))$. Writing $VV^* = \sum B_{i,j} \otimes e_{i,j}$, taking $x=e_{i,j}$, $y=e_{s,t}$, and using that $T$ preserves the scalar product, one gets $\langle e_{i,j},e_{s,t}\rangle= Tr(B_{s,i}B_{j,t})$. But $VV^*$ being self-adjoint, this becomes $\delta_{i,s}\delta_{j,t}= \langle B_{s,i},B_{t,j}\rangle$. This implies that $B_{s,i}=0$ if $s\neq i$ and that the matrices $B_{i,i}$ are all of Hilbert-Schmidt norm $1$, and that $\langle B_{i,i},B_{j,j}\rangle=1$. Thus (equality in Cauchy-Schwartz inequality), the $B_{i,i}$'s are all equal, to some matrix $U$. This proves the claim.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for adding the proof! –  Matthew Daws May 11 '11 at 12:12
    
Thanks Mikael! Isometry is necessary, but alone it is not sufficient: for example, if ($n=2$ and) $A_i$ are the normalized Pauli matrices, then $T$ is isometric but not completely positive (indeed not even positive). As you note, $T(1)$ seems to play an important role in getting a necessary condition. –  Chris Heunen May 11 '11 at 20:16
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.