Sign up ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Here is the problem: Two mathematicians meet at a bar. They like each other and tend to collaborate. But it is not so clear what problems could be of common interest to both of them. Of course, the traditional way is they keep describing they work or their field in general so that hopefully they catch something at the end. But is there any reference, graph, table or whatever that they can use to help them? This, of course, makes sense only when such a reference keeps updated based on the continuous production in mathematics.

share|cite|improve this question

closed as not a real question by André Henriques, Ryan Budney, Andrés Caicedo, Gerry Myerson, Todd Trimble May 2 '11 at 0:11

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Way too vague. I imagine this will get closed soon unless you improve the wording of your question. –  Thierry Zell May 1 '11 at 20:16
I'm voting to close. This question cannot lead anywhere. My guess is that your graph is the complete graph. –  André Henriques May 1 '11 at 20:16
I think your question title and question body are at odds with each other. Two mathematicians may collaborate on a problem without necessarily creating a connection between their main fields of study. Rewrite both the title and question if you have a hope of getting a good question. Gerhard "Ask Me About System Design" Paseman , 2011.05.01 –  Gerhard Paseman May 1 '11 at 20:25
There are always and eharmony. Note that in more and more parts of the world, it is legal for mathematicians to marry. –  Will Jagy May 1 '11 at 23:38
I've just cast the deciding vote to close. The question is naive to an extreme, for reasons I don't feel like articulating at the moment. Take it up on meta if you must. –  Todd Trimble May 2 '11 at 0:12

2 Answers 2

If I understand your question correctly: I think that dialogue is a far better way to settle on possible directions for collaboration than looking up MSC codes or tables saying how many times the phrases "noncommutative geometry" or "mirror symmetry" are mentioned in a given article. So I think your question is starting from a dubious premise.

share|cite|improve this answer

First, I have to agree that in principle this is too broad a question. Many fields are closely related, some are vaguely related, and some are at first sight unrelated (but one never knows). And, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez suggestion how to find out about frequent interactions of fields is a very good one.

Second, André Henriques says the graph is the complete graph. And, yes I guess if one looks carefully enough this is indeed true. A place where something along these lines is in my opinion argued very convincingly, and one of my favorite mathematical talks, is "The Importance of Mathematics. A Lecture by Timothy Gowers" available on video, e.g., here but I assume elsewhere too.

From the description of the video:

His theme underscores the unity of different apparently diverse sub-fields of mathematics. His exposition is exceptionally clear and easy to follow, making mathematics accessible to non-experts. This lecture is a treasure trove of mathematical intuition and insight into the relationship between mathematics and its applications. Using historical and present-day examples, the speaker makes a convincing argument that mathematics plays a crucial role in the advancement of science.

For example it shows (if I remember correctly) how to arrive in a very natural way from questions on PDEs to questions of (combinatorial) number theory. My memeory is a bit vague, so this might not be exact but something along these lines, which also reminds me that I should rewatch the video some time soon.

Sorry, to those who think this question should not be answered, or think my answer is not precise enough. But, I like this talk a lot and did not want to miss this (in my opinion) fitting opportunity to mention it.

share|cite|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.