MathOverflow will be down for maintenance for approximately 3 hours, starting Monday evening (06/24/2013) at approximately 9:00 PM Eastern time (UTC-4).
1

1

It is known that, for $n \ge 3, 2 < p< 2^*$, the imbedding $H^1(\mathbb{R}^n) \hookrightarrow L^p(\mathbb{R}^n)$ is not compact. Let $G=O(n_1) \times O(n_2)\times\cdots\times O(n_k)$, with $n_1+n_2+\cdots+n_k=n, n_i \ge 2$, and $k \ge 1$. Define an action of $G$ on $H^1(\mathbb{R}^n)$ by $g.u=u\circ g^{-1}$, and denote by $H^1_G(\mathbb{R}^n)$ the subspace of $H^1(\mathbb{R}^n)$ which consists of the fixed points of that action, i.e. $g.u=u$ for all $g \in G$. Then the imbedding $H^1_G(\mathbb{R}^n) \hookrightarrow L^p(\mathbb{R}^n)$ is compact. The question is whether there exists a space $E \subsetneq H^1(\mathbb{R}^n)$, with $H^1_G(\mathbb{R}^n) \subsetneq E$, that is compactly imbedded into $L^p(\mathbb{R}^n)$ ?

flag

1 Answer

4

Of course yes, basically you achieve compactness with $H^1_r$ because you have local regularity plus decay at infinity (pointwise decay like $|x|^{(1-n)/2}$ to be precise, by Strauss-type inequalities). If I'm not mistaken, any weighted $H^1$ space with norm $\|\langle x\rangle^\epsilon u\|_{H^1}$ , $\epsilon>0$, should do the trick.

link|flag
1 
McPerso: you edited the original question but the argument holds the same, the underlying reason for compactness is decay at infinity of the functions with additional symmetry. – Piero D'Ancona Apr 30 2011 at 16:14
sorry that I modified my question, but thanks for the hint! – McParson Apr 30 2011 at 19:12

Your Answer

Get an OpenID
or

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.